Yahoo Groups archive

Elektron Musical Instruments

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:22 UTC

Message

RE: [elektron] sound on sound

2004-03-11 by marc s. davidson

..I just managed a cursory glance at the magazine , ( it was at sound
control the local music shop )so I haven't read the article in its entirety
- the only negative things I can recall are that Paul had noticed a bit of
mains hum from the sfx-6 and also a comment regarding different sequencer
lengths were not possible on each of the tracks..also that the recordings
were quantized so no "freestyle" recording permitted ....
He also says that the monomachine is a  " niche " product , expensive , but
expected a cult following..

The article covers at least four full pages and has still to hit the news
stands in the UK ( probably in the next couple of days ). Once I receive my
own copy I will share some more info with you..

All the best

Marc





-----Original Message-----
From: Joe [mailto:jmelnyk@...] 
Sent: 11 March 2004 17:57
To: elektron-users@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [elektron] sound on sound

On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 05:38:33PM -0000, marc s. davidson wrote:
> Hi  everyone..
> 
> Just to let you know , the monomachine is on the front cover of sound on
> sound magazine ( April )and has had a very positive review from Paul Nagle
.

thanks for the news marc!   now I wish I had a subscription so that I
wouldn't have to wait for the april to hit shelves in the US. :-)

regarding the review: any significant pros/cons? was it a "glowing"
review? any issues they had with it? etc...

Joe


 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.614 / Virus Database: 393 - Release Date: 05/03/2004
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.614 / Virus Database: 393 - Release Date: 05/03/2004

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.