Elektron Musical Instruments

but the point is that some sequencers can do it, and the Monomachine 
cannot. It is a feature that would be excellent to have on the 
Monomachine (though not everyone, apparently, would want to use it).

So, quite obviously, I think, a reviewer, who in the context of an 
otherwise excellent review mentions that this is something in which 
the Monomachine falls short, is certainly being quite reasonable. It 
is one feature that would make the sequencer more powerful, and most 
certainly wouldn't adversely affect anyone who doesn't use it!

I'm not sure what you meant about the MM being 'meant for creating 
patterns in a different way'? What about the instrument would 
essentially changed by this, other than the sequencer being made more 
powerful?

Don't get me wrong - I think that the sequencer is excellent! So, to 
me, it seems like a strange omission.

--- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, Automatic Panic 
<thesoundzoneinfo@y...> wrote:
> yeah but that's an evolver, my triton does it too but
> the MM was meant for creating patterns a different
> way. 
> 
> 
> --- droolmaster0 <implode7@p...> wrote:
> > --- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, Automatic
> > Panic 
> > <thesoundzoneinfo@y...> wrote:
> > > > and also a comment regarding different sequencer
> > > > > lengths were not possible on each of the
> > tracks..
> > > 
> > > roland, korg or yamaha haven't done this on any of
> > > their gear so what are they talking about. Do they
> > > want the MM to make write the music for them too? 
> > > 
> > > 
> > ? It is a very nice feature which is implemented on
> > some good 
> > sequencers. I would rather compare the Monomachine
> > with more creative 
> > type compositional tools than
> > Roland/Korg/Yamaha...it is quite easy 
> > with my Evolver to set up 4 sequences of differing
> > lengths, for 
> > instance.
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Search - Find what you're looking for faster
> http://search.yahoo.com