? perhaps my response sounded harsher than was intended. I was just trying to point out that a request for an ease of use feature isn't addressed by suggesting that the goal can be achieved by a method that is awkward or time consuming. I certainly don't feel personally attacked, and my dispute with Joe was resolved off line. --- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, "scutopus" <scutopus@y...> wrote: > i was a little dismayed when you and joe (who has been nothing but a > help and a sweetheart to others in this list) got in a tiff on this > list, but i didn't say anything because i thought it was a one-time > thing. now you go after ....sticman and i can't keep quiet. > what ....sticman was doing was stating an opinion that he himself > didn't need, just as those who were calling for the feature were > doing. no flaming, just an opinion. and you come back saying he was > minimizing their thoughts! > okay, an example:: i for one think Ravi is somewhat harsh in his > statements, but they are his opinions and he isn't hurting anyone in > stating them. i respect his ideas because they bring IDEAS to the > discussion. it seems like you feel personally attacked by people > stating their opinions when you don't agree with them, and i > apologize if you feel that way. but don't trumpet your opinion as > some oppressed minority. all of us who read this have been very > considerate of others' thoughts and ideas about these marvelous > machines and we go back to our gear and think if we ourselves as > individuals require the proposed feature. then we respond on the > list. frankly, i've enjoyed this list quite a bit until now. doesn't > mean i'll stop reading, though, so i'll see y'all on the flipside. > PEACE, > wendell. > > --- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, Gene Schwartz <implode7@p...> > wrote: > > I wrote about the 28 step pattern... > > > > I think that you don't quite understand the spirit behind these > requests. > > The people who have made them all like the Monomachine very much > (as far as > > I can tell). However, there are still ways in which the user > interface can > > be improved in orde to aid creativity. Some improvements are not > feasible > > technically, some might be contrary to the wishes of the majority > of users, > > and some might be specific to such a small minority that it isn't > worth the > > time and effort. In some of these cases, their is some workaround > in which > > the user could accomplish the desired goal, but because of the fact > that the > > workaround requires a different way of working altogether, it > doesn't really > > satisfy the goals of person who made the request. > > > > In my case, I wanted to see the 14 step (or other length) step > scales while > > I was recording in pattern mode. One doesn't work the same way in > song mode. > > Therefore your solution (which I was certainly aware of) doesn't > really > > address my request at all. The improvement I requested would > certainly help > > me, though I would understand if no one else desired this change, or > > Elektron thought that it would not be easy enough or impossible to > > accomplish. > > > > But before you minimize the requests of other users for > improvements which > > would really help them, think about the fact that it is not just the > > eventual technical accomplishment, but the creative process that > they might > > be thinking about.
Message
Re: Take it easy, Gene
2004-03-16 by droolmaster0
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.