Elektron Musical Instruments

I finished a track for the December contest (using only E12-CB). Where should I upload my 
files to? Should I make a new folder call "December Contest" inside the "Machinedrum 
Contest" folder?

Andrew

> I finished a track for the December contest (using only E12-CB). Where
> should I upload my
> files to? Should I make a new folder call "December Contest"
> inside the "Machinedrum
> Contest" folder?

I'll fix this in a little bit by archiving last month's entries.  I've
been busy and haven't gotten to it; sorry about that.  try submitting
later on today, if that's alright.

--- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, "sidstationownsyou" <sidstationownsyou@h...> 
wrote:
> 
> I finished a track for the December contest (using only E12-CB). Where should I upload 
my 
> files to? Should I make a new folder call "December Contest" inside the "Machinedrum 
> Contest" folder?

OK.  I've removed and archived november's entries.  feel free to post them for this month.  

please note that I've also changed the file size rule - you can have a file length up to 1MB 
now!  so however long your submission is, it's fine; just make sure you don't exceed the
file size limit!  hopefully, everyone's OK with this; it seems to be a better rule than the 30 
second one (which 90% of the people, including myself, exceeded anyway).

> OK.  I've removed and archived november's entries.  feel free to post 
> them for this month.
>
> please note that I've also changed the file size rule - you can have a 
> file length up to 1MB
> now!  so however long your submission is, it's fine; just make sure 
> you don't exceed the
> file size limit!  hopefully, everyone's OK with this; it seems to be a 
> better rule than the 30
> second one (which 90% of the people, including myself, exceeded 
> anyway).


I don't usually participate in the contest, due to usual lack of time
(well, I'm lazy really...)

But I think that the 30 sec. time limit was better than the 1MB limit 
(which could be much longer than 30 sec. at a low or variable bitrate).

if 30 sec. is not enough, you could raise it to 45-60 sec. and also 
impose a 1MB limit.

Everything IMHO obviously

On Dec 16, 2004, at 7:14 PM, Federico Ciapi wrote:

>  But I think that the 30 sec. time limit was better than the 1MB limit
>  (which could be much longer than 30 sec. at a low or variable 
> bitrate).
>
>  if 30 sec. is not enough, you could raise it to 45-60 sec. and also
>  impose a 1MB limit.

well, I'm certainly up for changing it to whatever.  I just thought it 
would be nice
to have a less-restrictive contest this month.  especially since it may 
be our last
one hosted by this group.

anyway, I hope the voice of the group will be heard - speak up and I'll 
do whatever
the majority wants!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]