EmaxII can certainly access more than 540 MB of hard disk space. In fact the EMAX-II file access table of harddisks and CDs can handle almost any size. Of course any space more than 850 MB wouldn't make a lot of sense since a total of 100 banks (of max 8MB each) + some index data is the max. useful space for any EMAX-II. However it seems that the physical format procedure built in the Emax- II OS is limited in its physical access, i.e. when the disk is too large the EMAX-II can't get an estimate of the physical disk space and hence it does not succeed in formatting the disk. That's a shame really, because for sure the logical disk layout and file access table have been designed for larger disks. In practice it seems that drives > 1GB cause problems on Emax-II, probably because the OS didn't think that such drives would ever exist :-) Anyway, I have an EMAX-II CD-ROM here which is logically formatted for 632 MB and the EMAX-II is perfectly able to access this space completely. (You can try yourself by making a 632 MB CD-ROM image with EMXP and filling it with > 70 banks of 8MB). Note also that the Emulator-III uses the exact same disk layout scheme as the EMAX-II; the EmuIII can access even larger sizes... If I remember well I've heard of someone using Iomega Jaz 2GB disks on his EmuIII. But of course the EmuIII OS is not the same as the Emax- II OS... ///E-Synthesist --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Tristan Upton" <tu@...> wrote: > > Hi John, > > Have you managed to actually fill the drive though? I remember reading some > time back that although the Emax II could save 100 banks, with up to 8MB per > bank, the total that could be stored on one hard disk was limited to 540MB > total. It may well be that a drive of over 540MB in size can be formatted > but will it all be usable. Maybe you could try and see? > > Regards, > > Tristan > > Saturday, October 6, 2007, 4:48:01 PM, you wrote: > > > > Thanks Tristan. The flash drive is a great idea and one I hadn't > thought of. As I said, I have a 700Mb HD in my Emax II now and it is > perfectly happy so 540 would not seem to be the limit. Thanks again > JW >
Message
Re: HD capacity
2007-10-06 by esynthesist
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.