I've considered it but the fact that you can only audition your sounds using the lousy onboard audio coming out the 1/8 jack convinced me to use older desktop Mac's with Audiomedia II cards. --- "m.sislack" <m.sislack@...> wrote: > > So, no one of you all ever intended running alchemy on a > powerbook > via rs422 ?! ;) > > regards moe > > > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, Mike Wolak <mikewolak@...> > wrote: > > > > I've got a PowerPC 8100 running 8.1 and a 68030 Mac > IIci > > running 7.6.1 and both run Alchemy 3.0 perfect using > RS422 > > Midi sample dump. > > > > Just my 2 cents but i've found that although sample > dumping > > over rs242 is convenient, to capture the true grit of > the > > converters I re-sample most of the time. > > > > Mike Wolak > > Emax SE HD w / external SCSI port installed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Rei <vjrei@...> wrote: > > > > > I had Motu Performer running from a powerbook once > (ages > > > ago). I used to use Master > > > Track, well master tracks couldn't transmit midi via > rs > > > 422 port while Performe could. I > > > assume alchemy may have the same problem, the drivers > the > > > software has to recognize > > > the port may not there. But that is just me guessing. > > > > > > > > > > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "m.sislack" <m.sislack@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello again together :) > > > > > > > > After all I solved my "alchemy-problem" by using > > > desktop macs and it is > > > > really running great using the self-made > rs422-cable. > > > So the question, > > > > why I still cannot get it running on any of my > > > powerbooks (pb 3400c, pb > > > > 1400cs) is getting even more mysterious. > > > > > > > > Has anyone of you experience concerning running > alchemy > > > on a pb? > > > > > > > > > > > > regards moe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Message
Re: SV: Re: [emax] Re: Which Mac for Alchemy?
2008-04-01 by Mike Wolak
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.