Emax

There's also a certain stability to it like SCSI..


 



________________________________
From: jammie <jammie.emma@...>
To: emax@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 12:18:08 PM
Subject: Re: [emax] Re: Converting wav files to Emax samples using EMXP





not better just faster a lot faster but not as fast as scsi but the emax 
does not respond to smdi any way so rs port is the fastes
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brooks Mosher" <brooksmosher@ gmail.com>
To: <emax@yahoogroups. com>
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: [emax] Re: Converting wav files to Emax samples using EMXP

just curious, is RS422 better than MIDI for transferring sample files?

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Elk Latham <elk_latham@sbcgloba l.net>wrote:

>
>
> Your right about not being good for PC users.
> If you're an Alchemy user on a mac you're not limited to using sd2 files.
> I make all my samples as well..
>
>
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> From: jammie <jammie.emma@ blueyonder. co.uk<jammie.emma% 40blueyonder. co.uk>
> >
> To: emax@yahoogroups. com <emax%40yahoogroups .com>
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 11:56:43 AM
>
> Subject: Re: [emax] Re: Converting wav files to Emax samples using EMXP
>
> thats only good if you have the old mac setup not good for pc and i like 
> to
> make up my own samples and not use other peoples sd2 bank files
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Elk Latham
> To: emax@yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 6:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [emax] Re: Converting wav files to Emax samples using EMXP
>
> Sample dumps over the RS422 port is my preferred method.
>
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> From: jammie <jammie.emma@ blueyonder. co.uk>
> To: emax@yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 10:02:15 AM
> Subject: Re: [emax] Re: Converting wav files to Emax samples using EMXP
>
> in sample dump you have to dump 1 sample at a time it takes the sample 16
> bits and transmits it at 12 bits i find the 27khz sample rate to be good 
> for
> drum sounds thats what i sample them at in my sp1200 and my eps/eps16+ 
> they
> get a good grainy sound which adds to that old hiphop sound thats what 
> gives
> the snares that that rasp a snare sample will take about
>
> 4 seconds to dump to a sample location
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Brooks Mosher
> To: emax@yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 5:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [emax] Re: Converting wav files to Emax samples using EMXP
>
> so from what i'm reading, EMXP isn't going to give us the best sound
> quality? i've never had any distortion problems using it myself, but i've
> never done tests to compare using EMXP to manually sampling into the
> machine.
>
> to use midi sample dump, do i need to set the sample rate to match the 
> Emax
> default? how long does a midi sample dump take for a full bank (or maxed
> out data of 512 ram)?
>
> thanks
>
> Brooks
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:51 AM, jammie <jammie.emma@ blueyonder. co.uk
> >wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > the best way to get a good quality sound into the emax is through midi
> > sample dump i use dissidants sample wrench as it works with all the old
> > samplers
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Chip
> > To: emax@yahoogroups. com <emax%40yahoogroups .com>
> > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 7:13 AM
> > Subject: [emax] Re: Converting wav files to Emax samples using EMXP
> >
> > another significat factor is the AD 12 bit conversor
> >
> > sometimes you get better results sampling a sound directly to emax's
> sample
> > input using a decent preamp.
> >
> > --- In emax@yahoogroups. com <emax%40yahoogroups .com>, "Rei" <vjrei@
> ...>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > The answer is very simple...
> > >
> > > Algoritms. Emu software is meant to work with Emu hardware. Is like
> when
> > you buy an iPod or any other music device, if you use some other kind of
> > headphones the sound is gonna be way different, usually bad.
> > >
> > > The OS of each Emu sampler is calibrated for its own hardware, if you
> > import an audio file only with the correct sample rate that doesn't mean
> > anything, you are missing the antialiasing filter, that is the one that
> > gives the texture and the quality to the actual sample other than the
> > samplerate.
> > >
> > > EMXP is only downgrading the sample rate but is not resampli with
> > antialiasing/ EQ or compression. That is what gives Emu its sound, they
> > really did an amazing job suking the sounds out of the technology back
> then.
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.387 / Virus Database: 270.13.12/2235 - Release Date: 07/13/09
> 05:56:00
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.387 / Virus Database: 270.13.12/2235 - Release Date: 07/13/09
> 05:56:00
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------ --------- --------- ------

Emax and Emax II User's Group Website

http://www.silveriafamily.comYahoo! Groups Links

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.387 / Virus Database: 270.13.12/2235 - Release Date: 07/13/09 
05:56:00




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]