On 15 Jul 2009, at 00:54, jammie wrote: > > a lot of people dont remember most of the best stuff was created on > analog 8 track tape and played live dubbed then overdubbed Exactly. Like the Beatles on the Teac 4 & 8 track machines. The Beatles have never sounded anything but brilliant. Ageless. > > janet jacksons first album was produced using analog synths and a > mirage and sounded dirty and great Right! And Jimmy-Jam brought-in the NED Synclavier as I remember at one point, but that was later in the game... I remember how "Control" just ripped through the music scene. She picked the best people. Dirty and great is best! "SexyBack" by Timberlake is really dirty sounding (no pun intended here!) and it's very effective. That production value was a choice and was created, too. > > dep mode there best stuff of the 80,s-90,s was using emaxes I think they were doing more design on Emaxes than anybody is saying. "Violator" really has that Emax sound all the way through it, sans Gore's guitar overpowering everything else. > > pink floyd they used kurzweil k2000,s I thought their best use ever was the EMS Synthi on "Dark Side of the Moon" It's extremely simple but the power is in the EMS Synthi. Being in the USA I only had access to the ARPs and Moogs and among the Americans to use the EMS were Todd Rundgren who squeezed every drop out of it one could get on "Something Anything" and "Wizard a True Star". The best effects were always the EMS synthi combined with variable tape speed. Then there was the classic use of Pete Townsend running the Hammond organ chords through the filter and gate of the EMS Synthi on the opening of "Won't get fooled again!" You know, I sat in front of an ARP 2600 for hours thinking: "How did Townsend get that sound out of the 2600's sample & hold! It's horrific!" He didn't!! That's the answer! It sounds like a synth, but it's the Hammond! Great trick! I could never get my hands on the EMS Snythis here in the States! It drove me mad! Lucky we had the Oberheim's though! > > computers are unreliable especialy for live work A very, very good point. And difficult to control, too. Any performer, a DJ, has to have a backup laptop if they're going to be using Live for a gig for example. MacBookPros can take a hell of a beating, but on the road is too much to ask. > > i have 30 samplers that i can load up and play at the same time you > cant do that with a software sampler you run out of processor speeds > and to have the same equivelant you would need 30 comps with > emulatorx hardware and software to even sound remotely as good as > the hardware Really fine point. And I remember all of the "Pros" telling me to dump all of my keyboards on the used marked and replace with a laptop as they did, and now they are really eating their words. They are using field recording gear for source material and trying to craft and shape new waves from that material, and they're jealous and mad as hell at people who didn't dump their gear because they were so stupid to do it! I've never really been able to "scrub" with a computer with the feel and speed of using my hands on tape or 35mm mag film and locate a slice point so easily... As we all know, Kontakt doesn't replace an Emax. They're two different animals entirely -- any comparison is pointless. Jammie -- any Synthi or EMS gear there in your house in all that gear some place??? :-) > > and im picking up hardware cheaper than a piece of software just > picked up a yamaha s3000 with zip100 drive and library for £51 + > postage of £16.99 > > the zip100 sell for £15-25 > > an emax1 se hd keyboard just sold for £120 on ebay in excelant > condition and EII are going for £100-300 If anybody ever sees one of the few EIV keyboards appear for sale I hope you'll post it to the list! They only made a few from what I understand and demand was dismal to non-existent. Nice to hear that some of this gear is still available out there some place... > > i think its good to have both soft and hardware as you have best of > both worlds and you can use comp for speed and the hardware for > musicality as they are designed as musical instruments Exactly. This was the point I made on the FL Studio BBS years ago. They have no concept of a "musical instrument" and that something was designed to be "played" and not mimicked -- the VSTi's do drop many times to the point of self-ridicule and FL STUDIO can be just another video game. Or, in the hands of somebody who knows how to grasp the power of the tool, it can really roar with intense and unique sound. Time and again, though, I've met kids who've become professionals who started-out initially with "Fruity-Loops" and an old broken-down PC and then added-on one PlugIn at a time and built-up this whole arsenal of tricks but ended-up jumping-into Cubase (still using FL Studio via ReWire) but Cubase became their main environment and then they started collecting old gear and new synths. One of the problems with the energy surrounding that whole Image-line crowd is that there are a lot of sharks there that are making a lot of cash selling PlugIns to a lot of inexperienced kids -- and that's their game. And it really is like a game -- one big Video Game. It's too bad. FL Studio has a lot of power and people don't exploit that part of the tool. Thanks for the fine comments and wise points, Jammie! Since were on this point of hardware vs software what do you think of the Virus software synth with the hardware board that powers it? I own the last revision of the Virus C rack/desktop, and one ProTools user I know was just shaking his head and saying I was foolish to not go the PlugIn soft-hard combo Virus synth. But I had reasons for not going the route and getting the C rack. But I recently saw the sofware PlugIn and it's really a different animal from what I could see: it's really streamlined-down to be a Trance/Dance synth, I think. Now that would have the power to perform with the hardware board to back it up! Had any experience with that one by chance...? The TI's just sound like severe aliasing and low resolution sound! Horrible! Not worth the price at all. *************************************** - This communication is confidential to the parties it is intended to serve - Truth does not fear investigation. "There are no secrets that time does not reveal." -- Jean Racine (1669) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [emax] Keeping track of "source material"...
2009-07-15 by ss
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.