Mmmm... of course I want to check what may be wrong in EMXP. If you have a file which translates wrong, please send me the file in zipped format and I'll have a look. Because I really want EMXP to be as HQ as possible. SF2 is the latest addition to EMXP but also the most complicated one. Moreover it's a feature that I'm not using a lot myself, so the "internal test cycle" here is not as good as with the other functions :-) ///E-Synthesist --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "jammie" <jammie.emma@...> wrote: > > it works i have managed to get sf2 instruments to convert to emax1/2 format files and e3 > > but the conversion from emax to sf2 was not correct as there are some samples in the upper region dont play properly so i used extreme sample converter to convert from e3 format to sf2 > > but as seeing as emxp is a free product its fantastic at what it does and no doubt esynthesis will iron out the problems > ----- Original Message ----- > From: esynthesist > To: emax@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 9:29 AM > Subject: [emax] Re: Questions on soundfont conversion > > > > You haven't ? > > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, nung242 <nung242@> wrote: > > > > Anyone have any luck converting a soundfont2 file to an EMAX II emx file yet with the new version of EMXP? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.427 / Virus Database: 270.14.111/2569 - Release Date: 12/16/09 19:52:00 > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: Questions on soundfont conversion
2009-12-17 by esynthesist
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.