Yahoo Groups archive

Emax

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:23 UTC

Message

Re: [emax] Re: DSDD Disks VS HD

2009-12-21 by Peter Pöml

Am 21.12.2009 um 21:17 schrieb Bob Conner:

> Because the HD magnetic media (coating) requires more power to be  
> written to than DDDS.
>
> If your DDDS drive does not have enough magnetic writing power the  
> data you record will be unstable and stop working sooner than if  
> written to DDDS disks (or not work at all... like one of our members  
> found out).
>
> I myself have never had a problem with HD disks used as DSDD in my  
> Emax II or in my many Atari ST computers over long periods of time.
>
> At this point it would be hard to say if you are better off using  
> new HD disks or DDDS if the DDDS have been sitting on a shelf for  
> 10+ years in unknown storage conditions (??? anybody?)
>

Interesting! I had good success with HD floppies; they seemed to work  
for me as well as DD floppies. (Emax II.) But I figured it might have  
been only luck. And, I mostly wrote them on a notebook and read them  
on the Emax - not vice versa.
> Are DDDS disks still made new?
>
I don't know.

But who wants 500 used ones? :-))

http://cgi.ebay.de/ATARI-500-gebrauchte-DD-Disketten-auch-fuer-Amiga_W0QQitemZ130352495025QQcmdZViewItemQQptZKlassische_Computer?hash=item1e599d39b1#ht_500wt_924

(Before several group members try to bid competetively and drive up  
the price, it might make more sense if one of us buys them and  
shares... :-)

I also seem to find some sources here in Germany which look like new  
floppies:
http://shopping.kelkoo.de/ssc-100353123-dd-disketten.html
http://www.vesalia.de/d_tdkmfd.htm
http://www.dataserve-retro.co.uk/index1.html (that's in the U.K.)

Peter

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.