Yahoo Groups archive

Emax

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:23 UTC

Message

Re: [emax] Re: E-MU EMAX II 2122 ... is 2122 a valid number for the emax II

2010-01-21 by tu@...

Yes, the model number sounds like a typo. I would not rely too much on the model number as an 
indication of the specifications. Many Emax II samplers will have upgraded RAM, an added hard 
drive or a change to stereo sampling and some may even have forgotten their options due to 
EEPROM corruption! 

/Tristan

On Thu, Jan 21st, 2010 at 12:35 PM, rascalrevenge <rascalrevenge@...> wrote:

> I Deleted last reply, I need glasses, lol.
> Must be a typo for 2212 then, I guess.
> 
> Emax II [Mono]
> * 2201 1MB Keyborad
> * 2202 1 MB Rack
> * 2203 1 MB Keyboard HD
> * 2204 1 MB Rack with HD
> * Hard Disk was 40MB
> * Launched mid 1989
> * Deleted mid 1990
> 
> Emax II [Stereo]
> * 2212 2MB Keyboard
> * 2213 2MB Rack
> * 2214 4MB Keyboard
> * Launched mid 1990 at
> * Summer NAMM 1990
> 
> Emax II Turbo [Stereo]
> * 2205 4/8MB Keyboard
> * 2206 4/8MB Rack
> 
> 
> --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "MatthewF" <mataloopy@...> wrote:
> >
> > readers: im looking at an ad selling an emax II listed
> > as model number 2122.. is that a valid model number
> > or does he maybe have 2212 marked wrong?
> > Wondering what the specs are on that model if it exists.
> > 
> > bear with me I tried to look up the model number chart
> > again but couldnt find it. If someone has the info
> > handy id appreciate it.
> > 
> > I will inquire with the seller once I have some facts to deal with
> > 
> > thanks
> > 
> > 
> > Matt
> >
> 
> 
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.