Yes, the model number sounds like a typo. I would not rely too much on the model number as an indication of the specifications. Many Emax II samplers will have upgraded RAM, an added hard drive or a change to stereo sampling and some may even have forgotten their options due to EEPROM corruption! /Tristan On Thu, Jan 21st, 2010 at 12:35 PM, rascalrevenge <rascalrevenge@...> wrote: > I Deleted last reply, I need glasses, lol. > Must be a typo for 2212 then, I guess. > > Emax II [Mono] > * 2201 1MB Keyborad > * 2202 1 MB Rack > * 2203 1 MB Keyboard HD > * 2204 1 MB Rack with HD > * Hard Disk was 40MB > * Launched mid 1989 > * Deleted mid 1990 > > Emax II [Stereo] > * 2212 2MB Keyboard > * 2213 2MB Rack > * 2214 4MB Keyboard > * Launched mid 1990 at > * Summer NAMM 1990 > > Emax II Turbo [Stereo] > * 2205 4/8MB Keyboard > * 2206 4/8MB Rack > > > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "MatthewF" <mataloopy@...> wrote: > > > > readers: im looking at an ad selling an emax II listed > > as model number 2122.. is that a valid model number > > or does he maybe have 2212 marked wrong? > > Wondering what the specs are on that model if it exists. > > > > bear with me I tried to look up the model number chart > > again but couldnt find it. If someone has the info > > handy id appreciate it. > > > > I will inquire with the seller once I have some facts to deal with > > > > thanks > > > > > > Matt > > > > >
Message
Re: [emax] Re: E-MU EMAX II 2122 ... is 2122 a valid number for the emax II
2010-01-21 by tu@...
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.