Yahoo Groups archive

Emax

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:23 UTC

Thread

EMXP, best software EVER?

EMXP, best software EVER?

2008-05-05 by Chip

This post is only to be thankful of EMXP. This soft makes me love my 
Emax even more.

I only have 1 question/suggestion for E-Synthesist:

Would be possible to add to empx the ability of manage sequences in 
Emax banks?, and/or make a conversion to midi?.

If some day EMPX can do that, I never going to buy any new hardware 
anymore.

cheers!

Chip

Re: EMXP, best software EVER?

2008-05-09 by esynthesist

Hi Chip

After moving to another house I'm online again :-)
But my whole studio/lab is to be built completely from scratch again, 
except for the machines themselves...
So I'm "out of Emu business" for at least another few weeks.
Anyway, thx for appreciating the EMXP tool.

But what exactly do you mean by "managing sequences".
Do you want EMXP to be able to convert sequences between different 
samplers ? E.g. translating EMUII sequences to EMAX ?
That was not on my priority list because I thought no one was really 
using the builtin sequencers of these Emu machines (due to scratchpad 
restrictions).
I already have the specs of the EMAX/EMAXII sequences, but not yet of 
the other samplers (EIII, EII). So that feature would take quite some 
time... Especially with the EIII sequences, because the EIII 
sequencer is much more advanced than the other vintage EMU samplers.

Can you clarify your request ? 

///E-Synthesist


--- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Chip" <xtr909x@...> wrote:
>
> This post is only to be thankful of EMXP. This soft makes me love 
my 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Emax even more.
> 
> I only have 1 question/suggestion for E-Synthesist:
> 
> Would be possible to add to empx the ability of manage sequences in 
> Emax banks?, and/or make a conversion to midi?.
> 
> If some day EMPX can do that, I never going to buy any new hardware 
> anymore.
> 
> cheers!
> 
> Chip
>

Re: EMXP, best software EVER?

2008-05-09 by Tristan Upton

Transferring sequences between EII, EIII and Emax is not so useful. 

It would be great to be able to convert Emax sequences to/from standard MIDI 
files. Then you could take sequences from a computer sequencer and load them 
into the Emax with precise timing. Playing in via MIDI is problematic given 
the less than stable timing most USB MIDI interfaces provide. Using the 
external clock input to drive the Emax sequencer should allow much tighter 
playback timing than is possible via MIDI. 

Are you able to share the documentation on the Emax sequencer format? There 
is virtually no documentation in Emax the manual on the timing resolution 
and what messages are supported by the sequencer. 

Thanks, 

Tristan 

esynthesist writes: 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Hi Chip 
> 
> After moving to another house I'm online again :-)
> But my whole studio/lab is to be built completely from scratch again, 
> except for the machines themselves...
> So I'm "out of Emu business" for at least another few weeks.
> Anyway, thx for appreciating the EMXP tool. 
> 
> But what exactly do you mean by "managing sequences".
> Do you want EMXP to be able to convert sequences between different 
> samplers ? E.g. translating EMUII sequences to EMAX ?
> That was not on my priority list because I thought no one was really 
> using the builtin sequencers of these Emu machines (due to scratchpad 
> restrictions).
> I already have the specs of the EMAX/EMAXII sequences, but not yet of 
> the other samplers (EIII, EII). So that feature would take quite some 
> time... Especially with the EIII sequences, because the EIII 
> sequencer is much more advanced than the other vintage EMU samplers. 
> 
> Can you clarify your request ?  
> 
> ///E-Synthesist 
> 
> 
> --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Chip" <xtr909x@...> wrote:
>>
>> This post is only to be thankful of EMXP. This soft makes me love 
> my 
>> Emax even more. 
>> 
>> I only have 1 question/suggestion for E-Synthesist: 
>> 
>> Would be possible to add to empx the ability of manage sequences in 
>> Emax banks?, and/or make a conversion to midi?. 
>> 
>> If some day EMPX can do that, I never going to buy any new hardware 
>> anymore. 
>> 
>> cheers! 
>> 
>> Chip 
>>
>  
>

Re: EMXP, best software EVER?

2008-05-10 by Chip

that's exactly what i mean tristan!!!

the conversion from standard midi to emax would be a great tool. (we 
only need note on/off, velocity, mod/pitch wheel, midi channels and 
tempo information)
OK it's a scratch seq, but it could be very very very useful for live 
performances. (like factory -well quantized- sequences)


tnx for your answers!

chip


--- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Tristan Upton" <tu@...> wrote:
>
> Transferring sequences between EII, EIII and Emax is not so useful. 
> 
> It would be great to be able to convert Emax sequences to/from 
standard MIDI 
> files. Then you could take sequences from a computer sequencer and 
load them 
> into the Emax with precise timing. Playing in via MIDI is 
problematic given 
> the less than stable timing most USB MIDI interfaces provide. Using 
the 
> external clock input to drive the Emax sequencer should allow much 
tighter 
> playback timing than is possible via MIDI. 
> 
> Are you able to share the documentation on the Emax sequencer 
format? There 
> is virtually no documentation in Emax the manual on the timing 
resolution 
> and what messages are supported by the sequencer. 
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> Tristan 
> 
> esynthesist writes: 
> 
> > Hi Chip 
> > 
> > After moving to another house I'm online again :-)
> > But my whole studio/lab is to be built completely from scratch 
again, 
> > except for the machines themselves...
> > So I'm "out of Emu business" for at least another few weeks.
> > Anyway, thx for appreciating the EMXP tool. 
> > 
> > But what exactly do you mean by "managing sequences".
> > Do you want EMXP to be able to convert sequences between 
different 
> > samplers ? E.g. translating EMUII sequences to EMAX ?
> > That was not on my priority list because I thought no one was 
really 
> > using the builtin sequencers of these Emu machines (due to 
scratchpad 
> > restrictions).
> > I already have the specs of the EMAX/EMAXII sequences, but not 
yet of 
> > the other samplers (EIII, EII). So that feature would take quite 
some 
> > time... Especially with the EIII sequences, because the EIII 
> > sequencer is much more advanced than the other vintage EMU 
samplers. 
> > 
> > Can you clarify your request ?  
> > 
> > ///E-Synthesist 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Chip" <xtr909x@> wrote:
> >>
> >> This post is only to be thankful of EMXP. This soft makes me 
love 
> > my 
> >> Emax even more. 
> >> 
> >> I only have 1 question/suggestion for E-Synthesist: 
> >> 
> >> Would be possible to add to empx the ability of manage sequences 
in 
> >> Emax banks?, and/or make a conversion to midi?. 
> >> 
> >> If some day EMPX can do that, I never going to buy any new 
hardware 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> >> anymore. 
> >> 
> >> cheers! 
> >> 
> >> Chip 
> >>
> >  
> >
>

Re: EMXP, best software EVER?

2008-05-10 by gadgetfiddler

isn't it possible to route all of your midi hardware through a 
computer and then adjust timing offsets with software... isn't that a 
lot easier? i don't understand how copying sequences to an emax could 
resolve any issues, if timing is off and you trigger a sequence it 
would still be offtime. am i missing something?
I don't know if you're refering to usb synths/samplers or computer 
usb, but if it's computer usb i'd suggest using your soundcard 
instead. i've never had any timing issues playing my emax along with 
other samplers via midi from sequencer software routed through an 
mpu401 compatible soundcard. any typical soundcard found in a trashed 
computer is suitable... and free. 
   


--- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Chip" <xtr909x@...> wrote:
>
> that's exactly what i mean tristan!!!
> 
> the conversion from standard midi to emax would be a great tool. 
(we 
> only need note on/off, velocity, mod/pitch wheel, midi channels and 
> tempo information)
> OK it's a scratch seq, but it could be very very very useful for 
live 
> performances. (like factory -well quantized- sequences)
> 
> 
> tnx for your answers!
> 
> chip
> 
> 
> --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Tristan Upton" <tu@> wrote:
> >
> > Transferring sequences between EII, EIII and Emax is not so 
useful. 
> > 
> > It would be great to be able to convert Emax sequences to/from 
> standard MIDI 
> > files. Then you could take sequences from a computer sequencer 
and 
> load them 
> > into the Emax with precise timing. Playing in via MIDI is 
> problematic given 
> > the less than stable timing most USB MIDI interfaces provide. 
Using 
> the 
> > external clock input to drive the Emax sequencer should allow 
much 
> tighter 
> > playback timing than is possible via MIDI. 
> > 
> > Are you able to share the documentation on the Emax sequencer 
> format? There 
> > is virtually no documentation in Emax the manual on the timing 
> resolution 
> > and what messages are supported by the sequencer. 
> > 
> > Thanks, 
> > 
> > Tristan 
> > 
> > esynthesist writes: 
> > 
> > > Hi Chip 
> > > 
> > > After moving to another house I'm online again :-)
> > > But my whole studio/lab is to be built completely from scratch 
> again, 
> > > except for the machines themselves...
> > > So I'm "out of Emu business" for at least another few weeks.
> > > Anyway, thx for appreciating the EMXP tool. 
> > > 
> > > But what exactly do you mean by "managing sequences".
> > > Do you want EMXP to be able to convert sequences between 
> different 
> > > samplers ? E.g. translating EMUII sequences to EMAX ?
> > > That was not on my priority list because I thought no one was 
> really 
> > > using the builtin sequencers of these Emu machines (due to 
> scratchpad 
> > > restrictions).
> > > I already have the specs of the EMAX/EMAXII sequences, but not 
> yet of 
> > > the other samplers (EIII, EII). So that feature would take 
quite 
> some 
> > > time... Especially with the EIII sequences, because the EIII 
> > > sequencer is much more advanced than the other vintage EMU 
> samplers. 
> > > 
> > > Can you clarify your request ?  
> > > 
> > > ///E-Synthesist 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Chip" <xtr909x@> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> This post is only to be thankful of EMXP. This soft makes me 
> love 
> > > my 
> > >> Emax even more. 
> > >> 
> > >> I only have 1 question/suggestion for E-Synthesist: 
> > >> 
> > >> Would be possible to add to empx the ability of manage 
sequences 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> in 
> > >> Emax banks?, and/or make a conversion to midi?. 
> > >> 
> > >> If some day EMPX can do that, I never going to buy any new 
> hardware 
> > >> anymore. 
> > >> 
> > >> cheers! 
> > >> 
> > >> Chip 
> > >>
> > >  
> > >
> >
>

Re: EMXP, best software EVER?

2008-05-10 by Chip

The problem isn't real time sequencing from seq/pc to emax. When 
your're downloading or playing sequences from seq/pc all sounds good 
(I use mp401 port), but the problem comes when you record them to the 
emax sequencer, and play it from there (it's not play-timming 
problem, because the notes that sounds out-of-time are always in the 
same place. I've tried to record track by track, all track together, 
at slows tempo, at normal tempo, with the emax in slave, with no 
tempo reference, and even with the emax set at faster tempos than the 
sequence (for having more resolution in tpq).

I'm going to record a sequence that I use in live performances to 
show you these timing problems (there are small but perceptive for 
the musician ear)

chip.

 

--- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "gadgetfiddler" <gadgetfiddler@...> 
wrote:
>
> isn't it possible to route all of your midi hardware through a 
> computer and then adjust timing offsets with software... isn't that 
a 
> lot easier? i don't understand how copying sequences to an emax 
could 
> resolve any issues, if timing is off and you trigger a sequence it 
> would still be offtime. am i missing something?
> I don't know if you're refering to usb synths/samplers or computer 
> usb, but if it's computer usb i'd suggest using your soundcard 
> instead. i've never had any timing issues playing my emax along 
with 
> other samplers via midi from sequencer software routed through an 
> mpu401 compatible soundcard. any typical soundcard found in a 
trashed 
> computer is suitable... and free. 
>    
> 
> 
> --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Chip" <xtr909x@> wrote:
> >
> > that's exactly what i mean tristan!!!
> > 
> > the conversion from standard midi to emax would be a great tool. 
> (we 
> > only need note on/off, velocity, mod/pitch wheel, midi channels 
and 
> > tempo information)
> > OK it's a scratch seq, but it could be very very very useful for 
> live 
> > performances. (like factory -well quantized- sequences)
> > 
> > 
> > tnx for your answers!
> > 
> > chip
> > 
> > 
> > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Tristan Upton" <tu@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Transferring sequences between EII, EIII and Emax is not so 
> useful. 
> > > 
> > > It would be great to be able to convert Emax sequences to/from 
> > standard MIDI 
> > > files. Then you could take sequences from a computer sequencer 
> and 
> > load them 
> > > into the Emax with precise timing. Playing in via MIDI is 
> > problematic given 
> > > the less than stable timing most USB MIDI interfaces provide. 
> Using 
> > the 
> > > external clock input to drive the Emax sequencer should allow 
> much 
> > tighter 
> > > playback timing than is possible via MIDI. 
> > > 
> > > Are you able to share the documentation on the Emax sequencer 
> > format? There 
> > > is virtually no documentation in Emax the manual on the timing 
> > resolution 
> > > and what messages are supported by the sequencer. 
> > > 
> > > Thanks, 
> > > 
> > > Tristan 
> > > 
> > > esynthesist writes: 
> > > 
> > > > Hi Chip 
> > > > 
> > > > After moving to another house I'm online again :-)
> > > > But my whole studio/lab is to be built completely from 
scratch 
> > again, 
> > > > except for the machines themselves...
> > > > So I'm "out of Emu business" for at least another few weeks.
> > > > Anyway, thx for appreciating the EMXP tool. 
> > > > 
> > > > But what exactly do you mean by "managing sequences".
> > > > Do you want EMXP to be able to convert sequences between 
> > different 
> > > > samplers ? E.g. translating EMUII sequences to EMAX ?
> > > > That was not on my priority list because I thought no one was 
> > really 
> > > > using the builtin sequencers of these Emu machines (due to 
> > scratchpad 
> > > > restrictions).
> > > > I already have the specs of the EMAX/EMAXII sequences, but 
not 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > yet of 
> > > > the other samplers (EIII, EII). So that feature would take 
> quite 
> > some 
> > > > time... Especially with the EIII sequences, because the EIII 
> > > > sequencer is much more advanced than the other vintage EMU 
> > samplers. 
> > > > 
> > > > Can you clarify your request ?  
> > > > 
> > > > ///E-Synthesist 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Chip" <xtr909x@> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> This post is only to be thankful of EMXP. This soft makes me 
> > love 
> > > > my 
> > > >> Emax even more. 
> > > >> 
> > > >> I only have 1 question/suggestion for E-Synthesist: 
> > > >> 
> > > >> Would be possible to add to empx the ability of manage 
> sequences 
> > in 
> > > >> Emax banks?, and/or make a conversion to midi?. 
> > > >> 
> > > >> If some day EMPX can do that, I never going to buy any new 
> > hardware 
> > > >> anymore. 
> > > >> 
> > > >> cheers! 
> > > >> 
> > > >> Chip 
> > > >>
> > > >  
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [emax] Re: EMXP, best software EVER?

2008-05-10 by Lyn Oakey

One reason why you're having timing problems could be your host sequencers ppqn
is too fast for the Emax to interpret accurately.

I would imagine the Emax seq is running at  96 ppqn, as were most back then.
Now a modern-day seq, like Cubase SX, will be running at something like 3840 ppqn.
 
So, if any patterns are not hard-quantised, the Emax won't be able to capture the feel -
no matter how you record.

just a thought

Lyn
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Chip 
  To: emax@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 12:14 PM
  Subject: [emax] Re: EMXP, best software EVER?


  The problem isn't real time sequencing from seq/pc to emax. When 
  your're downloading or playing sequences from seq/pc all sounds good 
  (I use mp401 port), but the problem comes when you record them to the 
  emax sequencer, and play it from there (it's not play-timming 
  problem, because the notes that sounds out-of-time are always in the 
  same place. I've tried to record track by track, all track together, 
  at slows tempo, at normal tempo, with the emax in slave, with no 
  tempo reference, and even with the emax set at faster tempos than the 
  sequence (for having more resolution in tpq).

  I'm going to record a sequence that I use in live performances to 
  show you these timing problems (there are small but perceptive for 
  the musician ear)

  chip.

  --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "gadgetfiddler" <gadgetfiddler@...> 
  wrote:
  >
  > isn't it possible to route all of your midi hardware through a 
  > computer and then adjust timing offsets with software... isn't that 
  a 
  > lot easier? i don't understand how copying sequences to an emax 
  could 
  > resolve any issues, if timing is off and you trigger a sequence it 
  > would still be offtime. am i missing something?
  > I don't know if you're refering to usb synths/samplers or computer 
  > usb, but if it's computer usb i'd suggest using your soundcard 
  > instead. i've never had any timing issues playing my emax along 
  with 
  > other samplers via midi from sequencer software routed through an 
  > mpu401 compatible soundcard. any typical soundcard found in a 
  trashed 
  > computer is suitable... and free. 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Chip" <xtr909x@> wrote:
  > >
  > > that's exactly what i mean tristan!!!
  > > 
  > > the conversion from standard midi to emax would be a great tool. 
  > (we 
  > > only need note on/off, velocity, mod/pitch wheel, midi channels 
  and 
  > > tempo information)
  > > OK it's a scratch seq, but it could be very very very useful for 
  > live 
  > > performances. (like factory -well quantized- sequences)
  > > 
  > > 
  > > tnx for your answers!
  > > 
  > > chip
  > > 
  > > 
  > > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Tristan Upton" <tu@> wrote:
  > > >
  > > > Transferring sequences between EII, EIII and Emax is not so 
  > useful. 
  > > > 
  > > > It would be great to be able to convert Emax sequences to/from 
  > > standard MIDI 
  > > > files. Then you could take sequences from a computer sequencer 
  > and 
  > > load them 
  > > > into the Emax with precise timing. Playing in via MIDI is 
  > > problematic given 
  > > > the less than stable timing most USB MIDI interfaces provide. 
  > Using 
  > > the 
  > > > external clock input to drive the Emax sequencer should allow 
  > much 
  > > tighter 
  > > > playback timing than is possible via MIDI. 
  > > > 
  > > > Are you able to share the documentation on the Emax sequencer 
  > > format? There 
  > > > is virtually no documentation in Emax the manual on the timing 
  > > resolution 
  > > > and what messages are supported by the sequencer. 
  > > > 
  > > > Thanks, 
  > > > 
  > > > Tristan 
  > > > 
  > > > esynthesist writes: 
  > > > 
  > > > > Hi Chip 
  > > > > 
  > > > > After moving to another house I'm online again :-)
  > > > > But my whole studio/lab is to be built completely from 
  scratch 
  > > again, 
  > > > > except for the machines themselves...
  > > > > So I'm "out of Emu business" for at least another few weeks.
  > > > > Anyway, thx for appreciating the EMXP tool. 
  > > > > 
  > > > > But what exactly do you mean by "managing sequences".
  > > > > Do you want EMXP to be able to convert sequences between 
  > > different 
  > > > > samplers ? E.g. translating EMUII sequences to EMAX ?
  > > > > That was not on my priority list because I thought no one was 
  > > really 
  > > > > using the builtin sequencers of these Emu machines (due to 
  > > scratchpad 
  > > > > restrictions).
  > > > > I already have the specs of the EMAX/EMAXII sequences, but 
  not 
  > > yet of 
  > > > > the other samplers (EIII, EII). So that feature would take 
  > quite 
  > > some 
  > > > > time... Especially with the EIII sequences, because the EIII 
  > > > > sequencer is much more advanced than the other vintage EMU 
  > > samplers. 
  > > > > 
  > > > > Can you clarify your request ? 
  > > > > 
  > > > > ///E-Synthesist 
  > > > > 
  > > > > 
  > > > > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Chip" <xtr909x@> wrote:
  > > > >>
  > > > >> This post is only to be thankful of EMXP. This soft makes me 
  > > love 
  > > > > my 
  > > > >> Emax even more. 
  > > > >> 
  > > > >> I only have 1 question/suggestion for E-Synthesist: 
  > > > >> 
  > > > >> Would be possible to add to empx the ability of manage 
  > sequences 
  > > in 
  > > > >> Emax banks?, and/or make a conversion to midi?. 
  > > > >> 
  > > > >> If some day EMPX can do that, I never going to buy any new 
  > > hardware 
  > > > >> anymore. 
  > > > >> 
  > > > >> cheers! 
  > > > >> 
  > > > >> Chip 
  > > > >>
  > > > > 
  > > > >
  > > >
  > >
  >



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: EMXP, best software EVER?

2008-05-10 by Chip

you're right, but al least in my situation, I play 1/16 note 
quantised sequences, so i don't need high resolution recordings.

anyway, the master seq is not the problem, cause i always get the 
same results with any sequencer that I've used (alesis mmt8 -clock 
and midi configurations-, MC-505, cubase, or protools)

c

--- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Lyn Oakey" <lynoakey@...> wrote:
>
> One reason why you're having timing problems could be your host 
sequencers ppqn
> is too fast for the Emax to interpret accurately.
> 
> I would imagine the Emax seq is running at  96 ppqn, as were most 
back then.
> Now a modern-day seq, like Cubase SX, will be running at something 
like 3840 ppqn.
>  
> So, if any patterns are not hard-quantised, the Emax won't be able 
to capture the feel -
> no matter how you record.
> 
> just a thought
> 
> Lyn
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Chip 
>   To: emax@yahoogroups.com 
>   Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 12:14 PM
>   Subject: [emax] Re: EMXP, best software EVER?
> 
> 
>   The problem isn't real time sequencing from seq/pc to emax. When 
>   your're downloading or playing sequences from seq/pc all sounds 
good 
>   (I use mp401 port), but the problem comes when you record them to 
the 
>   emax sequencer, and play it from there (it's not play-timming 
>   problem, because the notes that sounds out-of-time are always in 
the 
>   same place. I've tried to record track by track, all track 
together, 
>   at slows tempo, at normal tempo, with the emax in slave, with no 
>   tempo reference, and even with the emax set at faster tempos than 
the 
>   sequence (for having more resolution in tpq).
> 
>   I'm going to record a sequence that I use in live performances to 
>   show you these timing problems (there are small but perceptive 
for 
>   the musician ear)
> 
>   chip.
> 
>   --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "gadgetfiddler" <gadgetfiddler@> 
>   wrote:
>   >
>   > isn't it possible to route all of your midi hardware through a 
>   > computer and then adjust timing offsets with software... isn't 
that 
>   a 
>   > lot easier? i don't understand how copying sequences to an emax 
>   could 
>   > resolve any issues, if timing is off and you trigger a sequence 
it 
>   > would still be offtime. am i missing something?
>   > I don't know if you're refering to usb synths/samplers or 
computer 
>   > usb, but if it's computer usb i'd suggest using your soundcard 
>   > instead. i've never had any timing issues playing my emax along 
>   with 
>   > other samplers via midi from sequencer software routed through 
an 
>   > mpu401 compatible soundcard. any typical soundcard found in a 
>   trashed 
>   > computer is suitable... and free. 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Chip" <xtr909x@> wrote:
>   > >
>   > > that's exactly what i mean tristan!!!
>   > > 
>   > > the conversion from standard midi to emax would be a great 
tool. 
>   > (we 
>   > > only need note on/off, velocity, mod/pitch wheel, midi 
channels 
>   and 
>   > > tempo information)
>   > > OK it's a scratch seq, but it could be very very very useful 
for 
>   > live 
>   > > performances. (like factory -well quantized- sequences)
>   > > 
>   > > 
>   > > tnx for your answers!
>   > > 
>   > > chip
>   > > 
>   > > 
>   > > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Tristan Upton" <tu@> wrote:
>   > > >
>   > > > Transferring sequences between EII, EIII and Emax is not so 
>   > useful. 
>   > > > 
>   > > > It would be great to be able to convert Emax sequences 
to/from 
>   > > standard MIDI 
>   > > > files. Then you could take sequences from a computer 
sequencer 
>   > and 
>   > > load them 
>   > > > into the Emax with precise timing. Playing in via MIDI is 
>   > > problematic given 
>   > > > the less than stable timing most USB MIDI interfaces 
provide. 
>   > Using 
>   > > the 
>   > > > external clock input to drive the Emax sequencer should 
allow 
>   > much 
>   > > tighter 
>   > > > playback timing than is possible via MIDI. 
>   > > > 
>   > > > Are you able to share the documentation on the Emax 
sequencer 
>   > > format? There 
>   > > > is virtually no documentation in Emax the manual on the 
timing 
>   > > resolution 
>   > > > and what messages are supported by the sequencer. 
>   > > > 
>   > > > Thanks, 
>   > > > 
>   > > > Tristan 
>   > > > 
>   > > > esynthesist writes: 
>   > > > 
>   > > > > Hi Chip 
>   > > > > 
>   > > > > After moving to another house I'm online again :-)
>   > > > > But my whole studio/lab is to be built completely from 
>   scratch 
>   > > again, 
>   > > > > except for the machines themselves...
>   > > > > So I'm "out of Emu business" for at least another few 
weeks.
>   > > > > Anyway, thx for appreciating the EMXP tool. 
>   > > > > 
>   > > > > But what exactly do you mean by "managing sequences".
>   > > > > Do you want EMXP to be able to convert sequences between 
>   > > different 
>   > > > > samplers ? E.g. translating EMUII sequences to EMAX ?
>   > > > > That was not on my priority list because I thought no one 
was 
>   > > really 
>   > > > > using the builtin sequencers of these Emu machines (due 
to 
>   > > scratchpad 
>   > > > > restrictions).
>   > > > > I already have the specs of the EMAX/EMAXII sequences, 
but 
>   not 
>   > > yet of 
>   > > > > the other samplers (EIII, EII). So that feature would 
take 
>   > quite 
>   > > some 
>   > > > > time... Especially with the EIII sequences, because the 
EIII 
>   > > > > sequencer is much more advanced than the other vintage 
EMU 
>   > > samplers. 
>   > > > > 
>   > > > > Can you clarify your request ? 
>   > > > > 
>   > > > > ///E-Synthesist 
>   > > > > 
>   > > > > 
>   > > > > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Chip" <xtr909x@> wrote:
>   > > > >>
>   > > > >> This post is only to be thankful of EMXP. This soft 
makes me 
>   > > love 
>   > > > > my 
>   > > > >> Emax even more. 
>   > > > >> 
>   > > > >> I only have 1 question/suggestion for E-Synthesist: 
>   > > > >> 
>   > > > >> Would be possible to add to empx the ability of manage 
>   > sequences 
>   > > in 
>   > > > >> Emax banks?, and/or make a conversion to midi?. 
>   > > > >> 
>   > > > >> If some day EMPX can do that, I never going to buy any 
new 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>   > > hardware 
>   > > > >> anymore. 
>   > > > >> 
>   > > > >> cheers! 
>   > > > >> 
>   > > > >> Chip 
>   > > > >>
>   > > > > 
>   > > > >
>   > > >
>   > >
>   >
> 
> 
> 
>    
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Re: [emax] Re: EMXP, best software EVER?

2008-05-11 by Tristan

Hi Chip,

Yeah, I would find MIDI file <-> Emax sequence conversion useful for
improving the timing on playback and syncing the Emax sequencer to
external non-MIDI devices via the external clock input. Slightly
different applications but the same requirement!

Regards,

Tristan

Saturday, May 10, 2008, 12:06:04 PM, you wrote:

>
that's exactly what i mean tristan!!!

the conversion from standard midi to emax would be a great tool. (we 
only need note on/off, velocity, mod/pitch wheel, midi channels and 
tempo information)
OK it's a scratch seq, but it could be very very very useful for live 
performances. (like factory -well quantized- sequences)

tnx for your answers!

chip

--- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Tristan Upton" <tu@...> wrote:
>
> Transferring sequences between EII, EIII and Emax is not so useful. 
> 
> It would be great to be able to convert Emax sequences to/from 
standard MIDI 
> files. Then you could take sequences from a computer sequencer and 
load them 
> into the Emax with precise timing. Playing in via MIDI is 
problematic given 
> the less than stable timing most USB MIDI interfaces provide. Using 
the 
> external clock input to drive the Emax sequencer should allow much 
tighter 
> playback timing than is possible via MIDI. 
> 
> Are you able to share the documentation on the Emax sequencer 
format? There 
> is virtually no documentation in Emax the manual on the timing 
resolution 
> and what messages are supported by the sequencer. 
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> Tristan 
> 
> esynthesist writes: 
> 
> > Hi Chip 
> > 
> > After moving to another house I'm online again :-)
> > But my whole studio/lab is to be built completely from scratch 
again, 
> > except for the machines themselves...
> > So I'm "out of Emu business" for at least another few weeks.
> > Anyway, thx for appreciating the EMXP tool. 
> > 
> > But what exactly do you mean by "managing sequences".
> > Do you want EMXP to be able to convert sequences between 
different 
> > samplers ? E.g. translating EMUII sequences to EMAX ?
> > That was not on my priority list because I thought no one was 
really 
> > using the builtin sequencers of these Emu machines (due to 
scratchpad 
> > restrictions).
> > I already have the specs of the EMAX/EMAXII sequences, but not 
yet of 
> > the other samplers (EIII, EII). So that feature would take quite 
some 
> > time... Especially with the EIII sequences, because the EIII 
> > sequencer is much more advanced than the other vintage EMU 
samplers. 
> > 
> > Can you clarify your request ? 
> > 
> > ///E-Synthesist 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Chip" <xtr909x@> wrote:
> >>
> >> This post is only to be thankful of EMXP. This soft makes me 
love 
> > my 
> >> Emax even more. 
> >> 
> >> I only have 1 question/suggestion for E-Synthesist: 
> >> 
> >> Would be possible to add to empx the ability of manage sequences 
in 
> >> Emax banks?, and/or make a conversion to midi?. 
> >> 
> >> If some day EMPX can do that, I never going to buy any new 
hardware 
> >> anymore. 
> >> 
> >> cheers! 
> >> 
> >> Chip 
> >>
> > 
> >
>

 





-- 
Best regards,
Tristan                            mailto:tu@...

Re[2]: [emax] Re: EMXP, best software EVER?

2008-05-11 by Tristan

Hi Lyn,

I suspect the Emax sequencer may actually only be 24 ppqn, the same as
MIDI clock. That is fine if everything is tightly on the beat, but one
clock of error puts your events off by ~21mS at 120 BPM. You might get
away with that for strings but for drums etc its way off. Its a real
shame Emu never included a quantise feature.

Regards,

Tristan

Saturday, May 10, 2008, 9:50:11 PM, you wrote:

>
One reason why you're having timing problems could be your host sequencers ppqn
is too fast for the Emax to interpret accurately.

I would imagine the Emax seq is running at 96 ppqn, as were most back then.
Now a modern-day seq, like Cubase SX, will be running at something like 3840 ppqn.

So, if any patterns are not hard-quantised, the Emax won't be able to capture the feel -
no matter how you record.

just a thought

Lyn
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Chip 
To: emax@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 12:14 PM
Subject: [emax] Re: EMXP, best software EVER?

The problem isn't real time sequencing from seq/pc to emax. When 
your're downloading or playing sequences from seq/pc all sounds good 
(I use mp401 port), but the problem comes when you record them to the 
emax sequencer, and play it from there (it's not play-timming 
problem, because the notes that sounds out-of-time are always in the 
same place. I've tried to record track by track, all track together, 
at slows tempo, at normal tempo, with the emax in slave, with no 
tempo reference, and even with the emax set at faster tempos than the 
sequence (for having more resolution in tpq).

I'm going to record a sequence that I use in live performances to 
show you these timing problems (there are small but perceptive for 
the musician ear)

chip.

--- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "gadgetfiddler" <gadgetfiddler@...> 
wrote:
>
> isn't it possible to route all of your midi hardware through a 
> computer and then adjust timing offsets with software... isn't that 
a 
> lot easier? i don't understand how copying sequences to an emax 
could 
> resolve any issues, if timing is off and you trigger a sequence it 
> would still be offtime. am i missing something?
> I don't know if you're refering to usb synths/samplers or computer 
> usb, but if it's computer usb i'd suggest using your soundcard 
> instead. i've never had any timing issues playing my emax along 
with 
> other samplers via midi from sequencer software routed through an 
> mpu401 compatible soundcard. any typical soundcard found in a 
trashed 
> computer is suitable... and free. 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Chip" <xtr909x@> wrote:
> >
> > that's exactly what i mean tristan!!!
> > 
> > the conversion from standard midi to emax would be a great tool. 
> (we 
> > only need note on/off, velocity, mod/pitch wheel, midi channels 
and 
> > tempo information)
> > OK it's a scratch seq, but it could be very very very useful for 
> live 
> > performances. (like factory -well quantized- sequences)
> > 
> > 
> > tnx for your answers!
> > 
> > chip
> > 
> > 
> > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Tristan Upton" <tu@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Transferring sequences between EII, EIII and Emax is not so 
> useful. 
> > > 
> > > It would be great to be able to convert Emax sequences to/from 
> > standard MIDI 
> > > files. Then you could take sequences from a computer sequencer 
> and 
> > load them 
> > > into the Emax with precise timing. Playing in via MIDI is 
> > problematic given 
> > > the less than stable timing most USB MIDI interfaces provide. 
> Using 
> > the 
> > > external clock input to drive the Emax sequencer should allow 
> much 
> > tighter 
> > > playback timing than is possible via MIDI. 
> > > 
> > > Are you able to share the documentation on the Emax sequencer 
> > format? There 
> > > is virtually no documentation in Emax the manual on the timing 
> > resolution 
> > > and what messages are supported by the sequencer. 
> > > 
> > > Thanks, 
> > > 
> > > Tristan 
> > > 
> > > esynthesist writes: 
> > > 
> > > > Hi Chip 
> > > > 
> > > > After moving to another house I'm online again :-)
> > > > But my whole studio/lab is to be built completely from 
scratch 
> > again, 
> > > > except for the machines themselves...
> > > > So I'm "out of Emu business" for at least another few weeks.
> > > > Anyway, thx for appreciating the EMXP tool. 
> > > > 
> > > > But what exactly do you mean by "managing sequences".
> > > > Do you want EMXP to be able to convert sequences between 
> > different 
> > > > samplers ? E.g. translating EMUII sequences to EMAX ?
> > > > That was not on my priority list because I thought no one was 
> > really 
> > > > using the builtin sequencers of these Emu machines (due to 
> > scratchpad 
> > > > restrictions).
> > > > I already have the specs of the EMAX/EMAXII sequences, but 
not 
> > yet of 
> > > > the other samplers (EIII, EII). So that feature would take 
> quite 
> > some 
> > > > time... Especially with the EIII sequences, because the EIII 
> > > > sequencer is much more advanced than the other vintage EMU 
> > samplers. 
> > > > 
> > > > Can you clarify your request ? 
> > > > 
> > > > ///E-Synthesist 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Chip" <xtr909x@> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> This post is only to be thankful of EMXP. This soft makes me 
> > love 
> > > > my 
> > > >> Emax even more. 
> > > >> 
> > > >> I only have 1 question/suggestion for E-Synthesist: 
> > > >> 
> > > >> Would be possible to add to empx the ability of manage 
> sequences 
> > in 
> > > >> Emax banks?, and/or make a conversion to midi?. 
> > > >> 
> > > >> If some day EMPX can do that, I never going to buy any new 
> > hardware 
> > > >> anymore. 
> > > >> 
> > > >> cheers! 
> > > >> 
> > > >> Chip 
> > > >>
> > > > 
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Re[2]: [emax] Re: EMXP, best software EVER?

2008-05-11 by Lyn Oakey

OK, I've just had a test play from the PC using Cubase VST 
(SX does not support Midi Clock In, VST does) 
With Cubase acting as both Master and Slave I didn't hear any sequence timing errors.

Using the basic Rap Drums preset, I sent a couple of drum sequences with 16t hats
and a couple of 32'nd snare fills at 96 and 130 bpm. 
I also made sure the notelengths were quantised so as not to overlap into one another.
Could this have possibly contributed to your timing issues ?

I used a Steinberg Midex 8 midi interface and the Emax is HD Plus with SCSI.
Being one of the later ones, it may have been improved in this area, who knows ? 

regards
Lyn
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Tristan 
  To: Lyn Oakey 
  Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 7:24 AM
  Subject: Re[2]: [emax] Re: EMXP, best software EVER?


  Hi Lyn,

  I suspect the Emax sequencer may actually only be 24 ppqn, the same as
  MIDI clock. That is fine if everything is tightly on the beat, but one
  clock of error puts your events off by ~21mS at 120 BPM. You might get
  away with that for strings but for drums etc its way off. Its a real
  shame Emu never included a quantise feature.

  Regards,

  Tristan

  Saturday, May 10, 2008, 9:50:11 PM, you wrote:

  >
  One reason why you're having timing problems could be your host sequencers ppqn
  is too fast for the Emax to interpret accurately.

  I would imagine the Emax seq is running at 96 ppqn, as were most back then.
  Now a modern-day seq, like Cubase SX, will be running at something like 3840 ppqn.

  So, if any patterns are not hard-quantised, the Emax won't be able to capture the feel -
  no matter how you record.

  just a thought

  Lyn

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Chip 
  To: emax@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 12:14 PM
  Subject: [emax] Re: EMXP, best software EVER?

  The problem isn't real time sequencing from seq/pc to emax. When 
  your're downloading or playing sequences from seq/pc all sounds good 
  (I use mp401 port), but the problem comes when you record them to the 
  emax sequencer, and play it from there (it's not play-timming 
  problem, because the notes that sounds out-of-time are always in the 
  same place. I've tried to record track by track, all track together, 
  at slows tempo, at normal tempo, with the emax in slave, with no 
  tempo reference, and even with the emax set at faster tempos than the 
  sequence (for having more resolution in tpq).

  I'm going to record a sequence that I use in live performances to 
  show you these timing problems (there are small but perceptive for 
  the musician ear)

  chip.

  --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "gadgetfiddler" <gadgetfiddler@...> 
  wrote:
  >
  > isn't it possible to route all of your midi hardware through a 
  > computer and then adjust timing offsets with software... isn't that 
  a 
  > lot easier? i don't understand how copying sequences to an emax 
  could 
  > resolve any issues, if timing is off and you trigger a sequence it 
  > would still be offtime. am i missing something?
  > I don't know if you're refering to usb synths/samplers or computer 
  > usb, but if it's computer usb i'd suggest using your soundcard 
  > instead. i've never had any timing issues playing my emax along 
  with 
  > other samplers via midi from sequencer software routed through an 
  > mpu401 compatible soundcard. any typical soundcard found in a 
  trashed 
  > computer is suitable... and free. 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Chip" <xtr909x@> wrote:
  > >
  > > that's exactly what i mean tristan!!!
  > > 
  > > the conversion from standard midi to emax would be a great tool. 
  > (we 
  > > only need note on/off, velocity, mod/pitch wheel, midi channels 
  and 
  > > tempo information)
  > > OK it's a scratch seq, but it could be very very very useful for 
  > live 
  > > performances. (like factory -well quantized- sequences)
  > > 
  > > 
  > > tnx for your answers!
  > > 
  > > chip
  > > 
  > > 
  > > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Tristan Upton" <tu@> wrote:
  > > >
  > > > Transferring sequences between EII, EIII and Emax is not so 
  > useful. 
  > > > 
  > > > It would be great to be able to convert Emax sequences to/from 
  > > standard MIDI 
  > > > files. Then you could take sequences from a computer sequencer 
  > and 
  > > load them 
  > > > into the Emax with precise timing. Playing in via MIDI is 
  > > problematic given 
  > > > the less than stable timing most USB MIDI interfaces provide. 
  > Using 
  > > the 
  > > > external clock input to drive the Emax sequencer should allow 
  > much 
  > > tighter 
  > > > playback timing than is possible via MIDI. 
  > > > 
  > > > Are you able to share the documentation on the Emax sequencer 
  > > format? There 
  > > > is virtually no documentation in Emax the manual on the timing 
  > > resolution 
  > > > and what messages are supported by the sequencer. 
  > > > 
  > > > Thanks, 
  > > > 
  > > > Tristan 
  > > > 
  > > > esynthesist writes: 
  > > > 
  > > > > Hi Chip 
  > > > > 
  > > > > After moving to another house I'm online again :-)
  > > > > But my whole studio/lab is to be built completely from 
  scratch 
  > > again, 
  > > > > except for the machines themselves...
  > > > > So I'm "out of Emu business" for at least another few weeks.
  > > > > Anyway, thx for appreciating the EMXP tool. 
  > > > > 
  > > > > But what exactly do you mean by "managing sequences".
  > > > > Do you want EMXP to be able to convert sequences between 
  > > different 
  > > > > samplers ? E.g. translating EMUII sequences to EMAX ?
  > > > > That was not on my priority list because I thought no one was 
  > > really 
  > > > > using the builtin sequencers of these Emu machines (due to 
  > > scratchpad 
  > > > > restrictions).
  > > > > I already have the specs of the EMAX/EMAXII sequences, but 
  not 
  > > yet of 
  > > > > the other samplers (EIII, EII). So that feature would take 
  > quite 
  > > some 
  > > > > time... Especially with the EIII sequences, because the EIII 
  > > > > sequencer is much more advanced than the other vintage EMU 
  > > samplers. 
  > > > > 
  > > > > Can you clarify your request ? 
  > > > > 
  > > > > ///E-Synthesist 
  > > > > 
  > > > > 
  > > > > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Chip" <xtr909x@> wrote:
  > > > >>
  > > > >> This post is only to be thankful of EMXP. This soft makes me 
  > > love 
  > > > > my 
  > > > >> Emax even more. 
  > > > >> 
  > > > >> I only have 1 question/suggestion for E-Synthesist: 
  > > > >> 
  > > > >> Would be possible to add to empx the ability of manage 
  > sequences 
  > > in 
  > > > >> Emax banks?, and/or make a conversion to midi?. 
  > > > >> 
  > > > >> If some day EMPX can do that, I never going to buy any new 
  > > hardware 
  > > > >> anymore. 
  > > > >> 
  > > > >> cheers! 
  > > > >> 
  > > > >> Chip 
  > > > >>
  > > > > 
  > > > >
  > > >
  > >
  >

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[emax] Re: EMXP, best software EVER?

2008-05-11 by Chip

can you upload an audio file of the recorded sequence played from the 
emax? (by the way, for the sequence recordings I'm using an original 
emax HD model 1010, upgraded to SE too (board PC333 rev C). I'm going 
to try the SE model 1000 now (board 237 rev 2 C), to see if there are 
some difference.

I should try the cubase vst, but i can't find old versions of cubase.


chip!


--- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Lyn Oakey" <lynoakey@...> wrote:
>
> OK, I've just had a test play from the PC using Cubase VST 
> (SX does not support Midi Clock In, VST does) 
> With Cubase acting as both Master and Slave I didn't hear any 
sequence timing errors.
> 
> Using the basic Rap Drums preset, I sent a couple of drum sequences 
with 16t hats
> and a couple of 32'nd snare fills at 96 and 130 bpm. 
> I also made sure the notelengths were quantised so as not to 
overlap into one another.
> Could this have possibly contributed to your timing issues ?
> 
> I used a Steinberg Midex 8 midi interface and the Emax is HD Plus 
with SCSI.
> Being one of the later ones, it may have been improved in this 
area, who knows ? 
> 
> regards
> Lyn
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Tristan 
>   To: Lyn Oakey 
>   Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 7:24 AM
>   Subject: Re[2]: [emax] Re: EMXP, best software EVER?
> 
> 
>   Hi Lyn,
> 
>   I suspect the Emax sequencer may actually only be 24 ppqn, the 
same as
>   MIDI clock. That is fine if everything is tightly on the beat, 
but one
>   clock of error puts your events off by ~21mS at 120 BPM. You 
might get
>   away with that for strings but for drums etc its way off. Its a 
real
>   shame Emu never included a quantise feature.
> 
>   Regards,
> 
>   Tristan
> 
>   Saturday, May 10, 2008, 9:50:11 PM, you wrote:
> 
>   >
>   One reason why you're having timing problems could be your host 
sequencers ppqn
>   is too fast for the Emax to interpret accurately.
> 
>   I would imagine the Emax seq is running at 96 ppqn, as were most 
back then.
>   Now a modern-day seq, like Cubase SX, will be running at 
something like 3840 ppqn.
> 
>   So, if any patterns are not hard-quantised, the Emax won't be 
able to capture the feel -
>   no matter how you record.
> 
>   just a thought
> 
>   Lyn
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Chip 
>   To: emax@yahoogroups.com 
>   Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 12:14 PM
>   Subject: [emax] Re: EMXP, best software EVER?
> 
>   The problem isn't real time sequencing from seq/pc to emax. When 
>   your're downloading or playing sequences from seq/pc all sounds 
good 
>   (I use mp401 port), but the problem comes when you record them to 
the 
>   emax sequencer, and play it from there (it's not play-timming 
>   problem, because the notes that sounds out-of-time are always in 
the 
>   same place. I've tried to record track by track, all track 
together, 
>   at slows tempo, at normal tempo, with the emax in slave, with no 
>   tempo reference, and even with the emax set at faster tempos than 
the 
>   sequence (for having more resolution in tpq).
> 
>   I'm going to record a sequence that I use in live performances to 
>   show you these timing problems (there are small but perceptive 
for 
>   the musician ear)
> 
>   chip.
> 
>   --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "gadgetfiddler" <gadgetfiddler@> 
>   wrote:
>   >
>   > isn't it possible to route all of your midi hardware through a 
>   > computer and then adjust timing offsets with software... isn't 
that 
>   a 
>   > lot easier? i don't understand how copying sequences to an emax 
>   could 
>   > resolve any issues, if timing is off and you trigger a sequence 
it 
>   > would still be offtime. am i missing something?
>   > I don't know if you're refering to usb synths/samplers or 
computer 
>   > usb, but if it's computer usb i'd suggest using your soundcard 
>   > instead. i've never had any timing issues playing my emax along 
>   with 
>   > other samplers via midi from sequencer software routed through 
an 
>   > mpu401 compatible soundcard. any typical soundcard found in a 
>   trashed 
>   > computer is suitable... and free. 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Chip" <xtr909x@> wrote:
>   > >
>   > > that's exactly what i mean tristan!!!
>   > > 
>   > > the conversion from standard midi to emax would be a great 
tool. 
>   > (we 
>   > > only need note on/off, velocity, mod/pitch wheel, midi 
channels 
>   and 
>   > > tempo information)
>   > > OK it's a scratch seq, but it could be very very very useful 
for 
>   > live 
>   > > performances. (like factory -well quantized- sequences)
>   > > 
>   > > 
>   > > tnx for your answers!
>   > > 
>   > > chip
>   > > 
>   > > 
>   > > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Tristan Upton" <tu@> wrote:
>   > > >
>   > > > Transferring sequences between EII, EIII and Emax is not so 
>   > useful. 
>   > > > 
>   > > > It would be great to be able to convert Emax sequences 
to/from 
>   > > standard MIDI 
>   > > > files. Then you could take sequences from a computer 
sequencer 
>   > and 
>   > > load them 
>   > > > into the Emax with precise timing. Playing in via MIDI is 
>   > > problematic given 
>   > > > the less than stable timing most USB MIDI interfaces 
provide. 
>   > Using 
>   > > the 
>   > > > external clock input to drive the Emax sequencer should 
allow 
>   > much 
>   > > tighter 
>   > > > playback timing than is possible via MIDI. 
>   > > > 
>   > > > Are you able to share the documentation on the Emax 
sequencer 
>   > > format? There 
>   > > > is virtually no documentation in Emax the manual on the 
timing 
>   > > resolution 
>   > > > and what messages are supported by the sequencer. 
>   > > > 
>   > > > Thanks, 
>   > > > 
>   > > > Tristan 
>   > > > 
>   > > > esynthesist writes: 
>   > > > 
>   > > > > Hi Chip 
>   > > > > 
>   > > > > After moving to another house I'm online again :-)
>   > > > > But my whole studio/lab is to be built completely from 
>   scratch 
>   > > again, 
>   > > > > except for the machines themselves...
>   > > > > So I'm "out of Emu business" for at least another few 
weeks.
>   > > > > Anyway, thx for appreciating the EMXP tool. 
>   > > > > 
>   > > > > But what exactly do you mean by "managing sequences".
>   > > > > Do you want EMXP to be able to convert sequences between 
>   > > different 
>   > > > > samplers ? E.g. translating EMUII sequences to EMAX ?
>   > > > > That was not on my priority list because I thought no one 
was 
>   > > really 
>   > > > > using the builtin sequencers of these Emu machines (due 
to 
>   > > scratchpad 
>   > > > > restrictions).
>   > > > > I already have the specs of the EMAX/EMAXII sequences, 
but 
>   not 
>   > > yet of 
>   > > > > the other samplers (EIII, EII). So that feature would 
take 
>   > quite 
>   > > some 
>   > > > > time... Especially with the EIII sequences, because the 
EIII 
>   > > > > sequencer is much more advanced than the other vintage 
EMU 
>   > > samplers. 
>   > > > > 
>   > > > > Can you clarify your request ? 
>   > > > > 
>   > > > > ///E-Synthesist 
>   > > > > 
>   > > > > 
>   > > > > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Chip" <xtr909x@> wrote:
>   > > > >>
>   > > > >> This post is only to be thankful of EMXP. This soft 
makes me 
>   > > love 
>   > > > > my 
>   > > > >> Emax even more. 
>   > > > >> 
>   > > > >> I only have 1 question/suggestion for E-Synthesist: 
>   > > > >> 
>   > > > >> Would be possible to add to empx the ability of manage 
>   > sequences 
>   > > in 
>   > > > >> Emax banks?, and/or make a conversion to midi?. 
>   > > > >> 
>   > > > >> If some day EMPX can do that, I never going to buy any 
new 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>   > > hardware 
>   > > > >> anymore. 
>   > > > >> 
>   > > > >> cheers! 
>   > > > >> 
>   > > > >> Chip 
>   > > > >>
>   > > > > 
>   > > > >
>   > > >
>   > >
>   >
> 
>   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
>    
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.