Hendrik Jan Veenstra wrote: > > <speculation> > I wonder if samplers are the real future at all btw. In a sense a > sampler is the poor man's solution to a complicated problem. You > want strings that are as realistic as possible, so... you simply > record (sample) them and use those recordings...? Basically that's > still the 30 year old mellotron approach (ignoring "artistic" uses of > samplers, but thinking purely about recreation of e.g. orchestral > sounds). > Isn't it far more likely that instead of some super-sampler with > 1000+ articulations and intelligent smooth-switching, that one day > we'll have a 20 THz computer with physically modelled instruments and > orchestras -- i.e. synthetic realtime sounds that closely mimic their > acoustic counterparts? Interesting speculation, Hendrik, especially since Nick has already mentioned his use of Yamaha's physical modelling technology, and I agree with you wholeheartedly. I've been bitten by the physical modelling bug with the Yamaha VL70-m, so I can certainly understand how Nick would be keen on the idea of a sound source responding to your playing style with different articulations, etc. It's a wonderfully organic way to play a synth! Even with a puny 1 voice of polyphony the VL70-m became my all-time favourite synth as soon as I started playing it. And like you, I don't see how a sampler could make good use of parameters like the rate of change of a controller. I still think samplers will be perfect when a "photo-realistic" but relatively straight sound is required (and they'll chew up less CPU power), but physical modelling IS fantastic when you need lots of organic-sounding nuances! Bring on Emagic's "Sculpture", I say! :-) > The only downside then probably is that you'll actually have to learn > to play a french horn before being able to correctly play the > physically modelled electronic instrument :-)). Awwww, diddums!!! ;-) Realistically, I reckon it'd be handy to know something about the instruments you're emulating, but I don't think virtuosity'll be necessary. It's the same with samplers anyway, I reckon...
Message
The Future of Samplers (was: EXS24 program changes)
2004-03-12 by Bill Canty
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.