On a fine day, 08-05-2004, nilknarfnimajneb wrote: >Hendrik Jan Veenstra <h@k...> wrote: > > All in all I don't really see the need for program changes with > > virtual instruments. > >I use SMFs quite a lot, to learn about arrangement, harmonic >progression, beats that go well with certain kindsa melodies etc. So >i want be able to just load up an SMF and listen to it, without the >hassle of having to set up the instruments each time. Even _with_ program changes, playing a SMF will continue to be a drag, I'm afraid. Unless the SMF contains built-in GM program changes of course (which you're presuming, I suppose). >So i don't need gazillions ofinstruments and i don't need 128 banks. >Just ONE bank with 128 standardised instruments will do. You _could_ make a song template with 128 EXS instances and... well... not really very convenient, I guess... :-) Uhm, what's the limit on number of virtual instruments anyway nowadays? Still 64? Or has it been upped to 128 somewhere along the line? -- Hendrik Jan Veenstra h @ k n o w a r e . n l Omega Art: http://www.omega-art.com/
Message
[EXS] Re: eMagic Sound Libraries
2004-05-10 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.