On 7/29/04 8:19 AM, "Julie Larson" <julielarson@...> wrote: > I ran the activity monitor yesterday and discovered that once my Song > had played all the way through....I was using all...completely all of > my ram. I'm surmising that this is putting a crunch on performance. It will definitely cause playback problems -- particularly if Logic is passing the virtual memory chores on to the OS itself! When I had my EXS prefs set the wrong way, it was damned nasty. In my previous post, I mentioned what I found to be the best settings to avoid this, keeping ass much of the RAM handling chores within Logic: "Sample Storage: "Original". "Yes, 32 Bit Float" does load more of the samples into RAM, effectively not using Logic's virtual memory. If your sample banks exceed your Mac's RAM and OS X starts to use its own virtual memory, however, things can get bad really fast." So, try running EXS's prefs with Sample Storage set to "original". That imparts a heavier load on the processor, but probably might be better than OS X's virtual memory. (also, did you reduce each EXS instance's polyphony down to each part's acceptable minimum?) > My only problem is that I can't add any more. Recent Powerbooks can take 2GB of RAM. > Soooo I'm afraid I'm > coming to the grim realization that I'm in the market for a new > computer. I need portability so....Has anyone heard any rumors about a > G5 powerbook? I've heard Apple is having a hard time keeping them from > melting. I wouldn't expect a G5 Powerbook until AT LEAST Macworld San Francisco in January (G5 iMacs are due for release in September, BTW). When that finally happens, I too will be looking into moving to a laptop. It would be nice to do a TV series score from a beach, somewhere :-)
Message
Re: [EXS] CPU overloads
2004-07-29 by Mac Duff
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.