On 31.12.2004, at 14:16, Hollow Sun wrote: > But even if you are not using a commercial studio to record your music > and > you literally do the whole track laying and mixdown process at home > with no > contravention of copyright, technically, you cannot then take your > master to > a mastering house because that facility doesn't have that library.... > even a > CD pressing plant should refuse to take it!! Hmmmmm! No, fortunately not. Neither the mastering studio nor the pressing plant is responsible for the content of a song unless it containes forbidden elements in terms of law. The responsible person is the one who sets something of a library (or a stolen melody) into the song - or the person who made such a song public when it wasn't intended for publication. In the latter case the copyright gets violated twice. Of course, private usage of non-payed libraries depends on the given license and takes us into grey areas again... Peter Ostry
Message
Re: [EXS] That's a a
2005-01-01 by Peter Ostry