On 04.06.2005, at 16:09, Hendrik Jan Veenstra wrote: > ... > However, in the case of Sascha who _always_ tries to be helpful (and > often succeeds :) I do think the moderators missed their mark. > Sascha is not some dum-*ss newbie looking for trouble, but he's a > valuable contributor who's never shown signs of b/w-thinking or being > shortsighted or prejudicial. If such a person posts something > regarding the supposed differences between Macs and PCs, I think he > ought to have enough credits that such a post makes it to the list. > ... > I simply sign that. And I hope that Sacha will stay here or return after a while. It would be some effort but maybe a rejected mail should not just get deleted but answered with one of two automatic replies: 1 - "Sorry, we cannot accept that. Please try to find another formulation." 2 - "C'm on, boy!" The second is for example to reject some of my mails if I have "my certain days"... :-) ___ Peter Ostry
Message
Re: [EXS] Good bye
2005-06-04 by Peter Ostry
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.