>Urgh! "real" operating system? Win2K? After all the bugs reported? >Well, well, well - I don\ufffdt care if it\ufffds called Windows 3000 or >"Hypellium" or whatever _if_ it works. And Win98SE works like a charm >on my machine (and many others I know, too). >We\ufffdll wait on Service Pack 1 for Win2K and see... I couldn\ufffdt disagree more. I am a professional C++ programmer and have been running on Win2k for several months and IMO it\ufffds the best OS that I have ever used, including MacOS (no disrespect intended for that great platform). You could be mixing up all the bugs reported on WinME which seem to be countless. Many enterprise financial companies are now switching to Win2k platform from mainframes because the windows platform offers at last solutions to enterprise sized business problems with COM+, MSMQ, etc... I can\ufffdt belive such big organisations would be thinking of making that switch if Win2k would be as full of bugs as you describe. >My Platinum >is performing great with Win98SE, crashes extremely seldom (probably less than >once a week due to very heavy usage sometimes _and_ despite using an AMD >processor). I think that there are few things that disrupt OS more than developing and testing software on it and Win2k is shurely not crashing on me once a week, I sincerely can\ufffdt remember the last time win2k made me have to restart my computer after a crash. I am running win2k on my laptop and I face the same problem as descriped by Gaggy, either downgrade my OS or get a running Radium release for my work on-the-road. Sad but true. Jonas Sig ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________
Message
Re : Re: The solution: Logic and Win2K
2000-10-17 by Jónas Sigurðsson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.