Willem Cramer wrote: > Wouldn't it be an idea to start writing emails to Emagic about the file > conversion promisses? Stay calm, Willem - mailbombing somebody has never ever been a good idea! Personally I am waiting on more conversions, too - but e.g. I\ufffdd like to have ASR-10 conversion, some others need Roland and so on... sounds like a difficult task to decide which ones are necessary and which not. Speaking of 3rd party progs, it has taken a looooong time until Chicken Systems have had their "Translator" up and running - and they are still fixing bugs despite adding new features. The whole Translator is more expensive (at least for us in Germany) than the EXS-24 sampler, another point. And as for Emagic not listening: They may not write back to you, but be asured that they *are* listening. Being part of the beta test program, I know very well about what I\ufffdm talking here. And there *are* things to come for the EXS-24 as well... One last thing: Steinberg have "announced" something "secret" and a lot of insiders tend to think that it will be a competitive sampler to the EXS-24. We\ufffdll see what it can, when it\ufffds out - and we\ufffdll see how Emagic reacts on this approach. Thomas
Message
Re: [exs] Converting to exs24 format
2000-12-21 by SBS.TBleicher@t-online.de
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.