> I'm using Translator Mac now, but haven't tried CDExtract. The crashing > problems I encountered were resolved by giving more memory (e.g. 256 MB) to > the program. Just for your information CDXtract uses less than 20 Megs to run, moreover it doesn't create any temp file. All the conversions are performed on the fly. And in this 20 megs you got plenty of formats, some advanced features like the possibility to select several programs and combine them on top of each other so that the velocity will allow you to switch from one program to another. You also get a database that can store an unlimited number of Akai,Roland and EMU discs. You can play any sampler disc as if it were a regular audio CD, there is a real time audio player for all the playing modes available in the hardware samplers, if you have the great Roland "distorted reality" disc you will be able to see the left and the right cursor going back and forth on some alternate loops. There is a report generator... yes all that in 20 megs only. CDXTRACT 4 is the result of more than 6 months of intensive work to build a very efficient and stable cross platform core, the next step will be the addition of new formats. CDXTRACT uses a driver technology for all it's source and destination formats, which mean that when we add a new source format it can be converted to all the destination formats instantly, no restriction. And because most of the source code is cross-platform, both versions will always be at the same level. The only differences between the PC and the Mac version is that the Mac version cannot convert to the MP3 format and the PC version cannot read the SD2 format (anyway it's a Mac only format) The demos will be available on Monday, thanks for your patience. Also a big thanks to all the betatesters from this list, I owe you a lot. bernard
Message
Re: Translator vs. CDxtract
2002-06-28 by bernard chavonnet
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.