EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group

PS: I didn't mean to sound so arrogant. Take this statement with a grain of
salt, please. I know the initial author meant well and was trying to make
people feel better about the situation. I believe I sounded kind of ticked
off about the first email, even though it didn't bother me that much. I just
wanted to propose a counter opinion... oh well.

> Dude, let it go... you're not going to change anyone's mind about this. They
> have a right to be upset. Keeping up with Logic software has increased
> people's efficiency and workflow (Version 5 automation for example). Telling
> them to get over their inaccessabilities to future improvements (many are
> still needed and are anxiously anticipated, even from the great minds of
> Emagic) is a crappy gesture. Your continual antagonism doesn't help stop the
> thread either. You are contributing to it simply by responding. I don't
> understand why people feel they have to tell other people what they should
> and shouldn't feel annoyed about. You can disagree, but don't belittle
> others for expressing their concern. Frankly, I believe a majority of list
> members are interested in this debate.
> 
>> To be fair, how much *new* standards need to be implemented in new releases?
>> Maybe a few new audio & video codecs, but thats about it. I'm not
>> disagreeing that on the whole this whole situation is a bad turn of affairs,
>> but I just dont understand the reason why people are saying that this is so
>> terrible they must drop Logic immediately for simething else. This is
>> madness in the 90% of cases where people arent needing some new feature as
>> in your case.
>> 
>> Anyway, I dont particularly want to get into this whole discussion. I'd
>> rather wait a few weeks and wait for official further details. At the moment
>> much of this is all based on speculation. If I didnt have to moderate all
>> the traffic on the LUG list I'd choose to block the threads entirely!