I think this is a great idea. If something has to be ported to OS X anyway why do it in VST if it can be done in Audio Units? Once you are in the OS X world the porting has to be done anyway so we should be encouraging people to do it right and get rid of these stupid competing standards. Another reason to encourage Emagic and Apple in this regard is that if everyone is using the same standard plug in, we will o longer have problems such as The Grand not working properly in Logic. It will also encourage multimedia users to use the Mac platform effectively because Video programs will be able to easily use Audio units as well. That includes us if we decide we are interested in branching out into other creative directions. We need a good standard and VST has not really done the job for Logic users in my opinion. Lets be open minded here. Regards Paul Nicholls > From: HELP@... > Reply-To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com > Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 12:18:38 -0400 > To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [exs] Logic 5.3 in MacOSX > > Yup. Not a joke. I have a lot of VST instruments. I sure hope the new > technology gets strong support. I know some VST developers are already > moving to the new format, so there is hope. > >> From: jddymackbn@... >> Reply-To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com >> Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 11:01:58 EDT >> To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com >> Subject: Re: [exs] Logic 5.3 in MacOSX >> >> Jer wrote: >> >> "Emagic is dropping VST support in its OSX development (drama city here we >> come):" >> >> >> R U Kidding Me?? They must be crazy....... or perhaps LAZY!! >> >> B*st%ds!! Sons of B%tch*s!!! >> >> }:( >> >> Angry J > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send a blank email to: > exs-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com > For a list of places to get free samples please see: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/exs-users/links/ > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >
Message
Re: [exs] Logic 5.3 in MacOSX
2002-09-04 by Paul Nicholls
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.