This is a very complicated subject, but there are two issues. One is the reselling of software, and the other is licensing sound recordings. It's easy to confuse them, but that's where people make the mistake. The legality of non-transferrable sound recording licenses have held up in court all over the world, many times over. You are correct about the software resale issue in Germany only...they have a new law which allows software resale....but it doesn't apply to any sound recording licensing....and it's only in Germany tomy knowledge. The reason sound library companies don't allow resale, is because you are licensing a recording for reuse in your own music. The legal basis and original idea stems from the origins of the soundware business, which was to provide a "Copyright clean/License free" alternative to the expensive process of licensing samples taken from records and CDs. The legality is based on the same concept though. If you licensed a sample from MCA records for a project, you pay a fee, and you don't gain the right to sell that license to someone else. Commercial samples are the same idea, but with the bonus of being able to use them on as many projects as you like. However, not having to pay for everytime you use the samples (license-free) has bred a strong sense of ownership of the sounds and CDs in users, and customers forget that it was a generous one-time license fee, and not a "product" that you are actually buying. I agree though that the crossover into hardware versions and virtual instruments has made it even more confusing these days. From the POV of a new user, it just seems bizarre...but if you think about how the industry evolved, it makes a lot of sense. Resale would be so much easier for companies to deal with if copies couldn't be made, and deauthorization was easy and standardized. It poses a lot of problems when the user can hang on to the sounds after selling them...especially now that the CDs themselves aren't very important in actually using the product. -EP --- In exs-users@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Gerdau" <mgd@t...> wrote: > >- I've long felt that it's wrong for a license to forbid you from > >reselling the library. If a developer wants to charge a registration > >transfer fee for support and updates, fine, but you should be able to > >sell a disc you don't use anymore. You can sell a hardware instrument > >with its factory sounds, and I see no difference. > > I've recently spoken to a lawyer on this very issue. > > He has informed me that he is well aware of this practice and that > he already won more than one lawsuit on this. There is a reference > case published by the "Amtsgericht" (however that translates into > english - some local court) Munich which basically says that > prohibiting reselling is to strong restricting the rights of > ownership of a customer to be valid. > > At least in germany it is not legal to prohibit reselling. AFAIC > YT is a german company... > > >I say that sample libraries should be sold as a *lease,* not a > >product. That at least would make it clear what's expected of the > >customer. The EW1 electric car was only leased, for example. > > Leases are time limited. As soon as you have this unlimited you > are back to selling a licence to use which of course could be > resold. > > >- Likewise, I don't understand the performance restrictions some > >companies impose. (I'm not talking about Spectrasonics, who just ask > >for credit on albums - that's perfectly reasonable.) But if you can > >use the factory sounds you paid for when you bought a hardware > >instrument any which way you choose, why are samples you bought any > >different? > > Just because some companies write this in their licences does not > mean it would hold in court. At least in germany. > > Best, > Michael > -- > Vote against SPAM - see http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/ > Michael Gerdau email: mgd@t... > Windows 9x is for wannabe computer gurus. > GPG/PGP-keys available on request or at public keyserver
Message
[exs] Re: Majestic/Culture
2003-01-09 by spectrumep <PersingEP@aol.com>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.