> In the case of YT, they _are_ intending their product to be used in a complete > and self contained manner. They aren't selling "just the samples", they're > selling the "container" around them as part of the product as well. > -- > Eli Krantzberg Eli, I just wanted to say, I'm secretly in love with you... (just adding to the other praise you've been getting lately) please, tell the nice folks at YT that if they put samples on the web that are in a standard format as a free download and they want to control what people do with them, they will be sorely disappointed. I don't like proprietary formats, I'd rather be able to use the samples I buy (on a cold day in hell) anywhere I choose if I pay for them. But, if a maker creates an instrument that is really good/unique, it wouldn't bother me at all if the samples are proprietary. I could always re-sample them anyway and no one would know the difference since I paid for them in the first place. bla, teddybut
Message
Re: Majestic/Culture
2003-01-12 by teddybut
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.