>> By publishing his stuff he relinquishes some of the control he has >> over it. Very much like a composer who publishes the score of his >> work. He may no longer prohibit public performance of it though he >> is entitled to a fee for each and every performance. But prohibiting >> it is no longer possible after publishing the score. > >Just to play devil's advocate here in our exploration of analogy to >the current YT issue: > >How come then it is okay to buy said sheet music, gather friends >around the piano in your house, and play it for them; all without fees >to the composer (other than those originally paid for the sheet music)? This is - at least in germany - allowed. It is covered under private use. However if you meet with some friends in a bar and there happens to be a piano and you sit down and play that piece then the bar owner is responsible that there is money paid for this _public_ performance. Wether you are doing it for your own entertainment or are getting money for it. >By publishing the sheet music, the composer relinquishes control over >how that sheet music is used. Not completely. Among other things the following is not allowed without consent from either the composer or the publisher (depending on what you do): - reuse that music in your own work, regardless of you paying a fee for it or not. - rearrange that music in any way (e.g. for choir or a different set of instruments). - publish a MIDI file from it. - create a new sheet music with different layout. - create a handwritten copy of the sheet music. It is effectively easier to state what is allowed: Perform the music as written down on the published sheet music and pay a fee when this is not done in private. >One might be inclined to point out that it is because it is not a >public performance. Actually it's not entirely private either though >if you have a bunch of friends over listening. In germany this woudl be considered a private performance. >I suggest that the YT issue is similar to the "bunch of friend's >gathering around the piano interpreting and making use of legitimately >aquired sheet music" metaphor. I still think considering samples as software and treating them like that is more appropriate. Best, Michael -- Vote against SPAM - see http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/ Michael Gerdau email: mgd@... C:\WINDOWS; C:\WINDOWS\RUN; C:\WINDOWS\CRASH; DEL WIN\*.* GPG/PGP-keys available on request or at public keyserver
Message
Re: [exs] Re: Majestic/Culture
2003-01-12 by Michael Gerdau
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.