EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:25 UTC

Message

Re: [exs] Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-12 by Michael Gerdau

>> By publishing his stuff he relinquishes some of the control he has
>> over it. Very much like a composer who publishes the score of his
>> work. He may no longer prohibit public performance of it though he
>> is entitled to a fee for each and every performance. But prohibiting
>> it is no longer possible after publishing the score.
>
>Just to play devil's advocate here in our exploration of analogy to
>the current YT issue:
>
>How come then it is okay to buy said sheet music, gather friends
>around the piano in your house, and play it for them; all without fees
>to the composer (other than those originally paid for the sheet music)?

This is - at least in germany - allowed. It is covered under private
use.

However if you meet with some friends in a bar and there happens to
be a piano and you sit down and play that piece then the bar owner is
responsible that there is money paid for this _public_ performance.
Wether you are doing it for your own entertainment or are getting
money for it.

>By publishing the sheet music, the composer relinquishes control over
>how that sheet music is used.

Not completely.

Among other things the following is not allowed without consent from
either the composer or the publisher (depending on what you do):
- reuse that music in your own work, regardless of you paying a fee
  for it or not.
- rearrange that music in any way (e.g. for choir or a different
  set of instruments).
- publish a MIDI file from it.
- create a new sheet music with different layout.
- create a handwritten copy of the sheet music.

It is effectively easier to state what is allowed:
Perform the music as written down on the published sheet music and
pay a fee when this is not done in private.

>One might be inclined to point out that it is because it is not a
>public performance. Actually it's not entirely private either though
>if you have a bunch of friends over listening. 

In germany this woudl be considered a private performance.

>I suggest that the YT issue is similar to the "bunch of friend's
>gathering around the piano interpreting and making use of legitimately
>aquired sheet music" metaphor.

I still think considering samples as software and treating them like
that is more appropriate.

Best,
Michael
--
 Vote against SPAM - see http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/
 Michael Gerdau       email: mgd@...
 C:\WINDOWS; C:\WINDOWS\RUN; C:\WINDOWS\CRASH; DEL WIN\*.*
 GPG/PGP-keys available on request or at public keyserver

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.