EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group

For the record, Hendrik, your email was inflammatory, hence the term flame.
Your original email, albeit very short, puts down another person's opinion
and was arrogant. If you can't see that, it's a shame. I have fired off
unfair retorts at people who may not have deserved it a few times, but I
usually don't have a problem admitting fault in that case. It doesn't mean
that I don't think I was right, but that's beside the point if I'm simply
being rude. You even admitted that you might have sounded rude in your first
email. Despite your indemnification clause, it still came off that way, even
to me who it wasn't directed at. This is getting far too technical. You both
seem to agree and yet the argument persists. On behalf of the list, I ask
you to let this go. Your just debating semantics at this point, and it's
futile. Ok, he forgot to mention a few other facets that "carry musical
emotion." Who gives a shit (besides you)? We all got your point and the
theme is becoming repetitive. Can we let this go? Please? -Jer

>> > I don't start a personal flame. 
> 
> Yes, you did. It was noticed. Don't change it ad hoq.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]