VST vs native
2001-05-28 by Arvid Solvang
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:25 UTC
Thread
2001-05-28 by Arvid Solvang
I have the EXS24 sampler for LAWP. I may want to crossgrade it to VST when it is being released since I also use Paris a lot. What will I miss? Will everything work the same way inside other sequensers? -- Arvid Solvang http://www.viagram.no/
2001-05-28 by HELP@MusicProTools.com
The VST version only does playback. It is not an editor. You can design the samples in logic and play them in Paris if that's your goal (at least that should work in theory). -Jer
> From: "Arvid Solvang" <arvid@...> > Reply-To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com > Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 20:22:23 +0200 > To: <exs-users@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [exs] VST vs native > > I have the EXS24 sampler for LAWP. > I may want to crossgrade it to VST when it is being released since I also > use Paris a lot. > > What will I miss? > Will everything work the same way inside other sequensers? > > -- > Arvid Solvang > http://www.viagram.no/ > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > exs-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
2001-05-28 by HELP@MusicProTools.com
I should qualify by saying this is what I heard from an e-magic rep. Seems pretty watered down and perhaps I'm wrong. But that's what I hear. -Jer
> The VST version only does playback. It is not an editor. You can design the > samples in logic and play them in Paris if that's your goal (at least that > should work in theory). -Jer
2001-05-30 by Arvid Solvang
-----Original Message-----
From: HELP@... <HELP@...> >The VST version only does playback. It is not an editor. You can design the >samples in logic and play them in Paris if that's your goal (at least that >should work in theory). -Jer Will it still be sampleaccurate or is that Logic only? EXS24 is actually only a sample player since you have to record into logic anyway and then import it to the EXS24. If you could record audio straight into the EXS24 it would be a sampler, but hey...I don't care much about that.... Can it only playback already made instruments and it can't edit anything on them? Isn't the instrument editor window in it at all? If that's it than it's a major drawback and I wouldn't even consider buying it... -- Arvid Solvang http://www.viagram.no/
2001-05-30 by Fernando Vicente
Hi, Arvid wrote, Will it still be sampleaccurate or is that Logic only? I believe that it is sample accurate as well but I'm not 100% sure. EXS24 is actually only a sample player since you have to record into logic anyway and then import it to the EXS24. If you could record audio straight into the EXS24 it would be a sampler, but hey...I don't care much about that.... Can it only playback already made instruments and it can't edit anything on them? Isn't the instrument editor window in it at all? You got it. I don't think most exs-24 users or potential ones are too worried about it being able to do its own sampling. However, the lack of an editor for the non-logic version I believe will be a major influence on how many are sold. I don't know why Emagic have decided to release it this way or just how much editing will be available. However, with other VSTi softsamplers on the market, would you choose the exs-24 if you didn't use Logic Audio? I would, myself, urge Emagic to release it with the full capability that it has for Logic. I suspect their reasons are more due to software piracy than anything else. If that's it than it's a major drawback and I wouldn't even consider buying it... I already own it and, after having used it for a brief period, I would probably buy it. However, if I didn't own Logic and was going to use it in one of the other sequencers, I don't know if I would invest the money into it when there are other softsamplers that do a similar job but yet allow full editing of their instruments. I plan on giving Emagic some feedback when I've used it enough and this is going to be one of the points I'll be making. All in all though, I'm really enjoying using the exs-24 and exploring its capabilities. It is going to come in extremely handy for my sequencing. I used to use an MPC2000XL as my main drum sample player (as well as my main sequencer for live use) sometimes just playing back samples and other times as a master with Logic synced to it (to take advantage of its special timing). With the sample accuracy and ease of use in Logic Audio, I have changed this. My MPC will pretty much only ever see action now for live gigs and I'll be using the exs-24 for all my drum needs. Once I upgrade my PC later this year (waiting for LAWP 5.0 and MP support), I can easily see myself being able to do entire songs by simply using my computer and softsamps and softsynths. It's a great time to be making music :-) Regards, Fernando [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2001-05-30 by Arvid Solvang
-----Original Message-----
From: Fernando Vicente <fvicente@...> >I already own it and, after having used it for a brief period, I would >probably buy it. I also own the Logic version, but I would never buy the VST version if it doesn't contain a sample editor. -- Arvid Solvang http://www.viagram.no/
2001-05-30 by HELP@MusicProTools.com
That is precisely my point.
> Can it only playback already made instruments and it can't edit anything on > them? > Isn't the instrument editor window in it at all? > > If that's it than it's a major drawback and I wouldn't even consider buying > it... > > -- > Arvid Solvang > http://www.viagram.no/ > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > exs-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
2001-05-30 by HELP@MusicProTools.com
> Arvid wrote, > Will it still be sampleaccurate or is that Logic only? VST is not sample accurate. Therefore, I think not.