EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:25 UTC

Thread

Re: [EXS] Re: Goodbye

Re: [EXS] Re: Goodbye

2005-06-06 by Sascha Franck

Hi,

First off, thanks for everybody's support, I really feel honored.
After some research it seems that it was indeed just Yahoo acting up... but I never got any mailer daemon failure notifications or
anything else, plus, some of my posts that didn't make contained some more or less "sneaky" side remarks towards Apple indeed, so I
thought they were moderated.
But then, it might've indeed only been some coincidence. So my sincere apologies to the moderators.

However, I'd like to comment on what Eli wrote (and I promise not to start a platform war or whatsoever), even if this would belong
to some OT thread.

> Sorry to hear you are leaving. I guess it's inevitable that as Logic
> grows and Apple plays more and more of a role in it's presence, it can
> seem like grass roots user groups like ours are getting co-opted into
> the mainstream, and regulated by "the man". But I think the reality is
> that, despite the politics behind Logic, it's just getting to be a much
> more widely known and used program.

I beg to strongly differ here. It *might* be different over there in america, but over here it seems to be dwindling away from the
market.
As some of you may know, I'm teaching computer music classes over here at the local conservatory. The students mostly are
professional musicians (or close to become such) and I'm sure some of them somewhat plan to set up semi-professional homestudios (or
even something better/bigger) for themselves too.

Now, my classes are all about "reproduce things you learned at home without spending a fortune". I did quite some investigations
before I started setting up the media lab, and while we probably could've afforded some lower level Macs as well (which would've
been a godsend for me personally as I could've continued teaching with Logic), in the end I just *had* to buy PCs, simply because
none of the people I asked allready owned a Mac, but almost everybody owned a pretty much reasonable PC allready.
FWIW, by spending, say, 300-500 Euro for a proper soundcard and some sequencer program, you can turn most actual PCs into a pretty
much reasonable audio workstation, at least good enough for a homestudio. Compared to that some "hey, you better buy a new computer
(a Mac) in order to being able to run Logic" would've been fairly bad advice in my book.

And then, it's not as if I didn't recommend this as another solution - I actually allways show them how much superior Logic (6.x on
our studio machines and even 5.5.1 on my laptop) is over SX (which is what we are using as our PC sequencers), regarding quite a lot
of aspects. Almost everybody usually even agrees, but there's not enough of agreement which would make people think about spending
around 1500 Euro (or something around that) for a new computer, especially considering they allready own a reasonable one. Of
course, in case you got no proper machine allready, in case you can get Logic at an educational price (which really is a steal), the
complete package would be a fairly priced one. But as said, all the folks I've been teaching so far allready own computers.

The same situation is reflected when you walk into the local music stores. Usually there's no Macs around (admittedly, Hannovers
music shops are the lousiest around, but it's not much different in other cities) but quite some PCs. So, the only chance to
actually see Logic in action is to either visit some studio or one of the few Mac dealers - and obviously, the latter usually got no
idea what Logic is even doing.

Now, finally, let's think about what those future wannabe studio owners and composers will be updating to, considering they a) are
allready used to PCs, b) have some PC based programs allready and c) made good experiences (which, believe it or don't, is possible
on PCs). Will they all of a sudden think about buying a Mac just to buy a new program which they'd have to learn in addition? Pretty
much unlikely in my book.
I know, in most professional studios the main machines are still Macs, and their main sequencer usually still is Logic. But I can
clearly see this changing over here. There's a few die-hard Logic users (such as me) who will actually switch from PCs to Macs, but
these are rare. And in, say, 5-10 years from now on, the people I'm teaching will probably run their own studios. They won't be
using Macs.

As said, the situation might be different in other parts of the world, but I think my observations are pretty much valid for a large
part of the newcomer business in germany (and probably the rest of Europe as well). I know about quite some Apple efforts made in
the USA, such as sponsoring media labs in schools, but this is rarely happening over here - on the other hand almost each and every
school over here (standard schools that is) allready has a PC-equipped media lab, which of course might be used for music lessons as
well.

Sorry for that lengthy excurse.

Anyways, I wanted to add something else, regarding Apple/Logic observations.
Meanwhile I'm rather familiar with working on Macs as well, and I'm really dissapointed about the direction Logic development took
since the takeover.
Of course, Logic is still a brilliant program from the ergonomical aspects, dual G5s are kickass machines when it comes to raw CPU
performance, especially when running an optimized program such as Logic, OSX is pretty easy to maintain once you looked up a few
things and so on...
But: How the most optimized audio sequencer, running on one of the most expensive computers isn't able to run half the audio tracks
I can run on my 6 year old audio PC (meanwhile serving as an office PC) is completely beyond my understanding (and yes, I did the
comparisons myself).
It also doesn't make it into my mind how you could only use 2 internal HDDs, 3 PCI cards and one internal CD/DVD drive. Aren't HUGE
sample libraries part of almost each and every audio production? Aren't DSP cards the tools of the trade these years? Aren't people
copying CDs and DVDs 1:1 since ages without having to do images first?

No, I don't think this is senseless Apple "dissing" - actually more to the opposite. IMO this is criticism the folks in Cupertino
should be aware of.
PCs with up to 8 internal HDD connectors exist because there was a demand for it. You need to spend half of a fortune to get even
only 4 HDDs connected to a Mac. Not to forget that FW busses still don't deliver the same performance as S-ATA/IDE ones.
Also, I just configured a Nuendo based PC for a friend, he's using 2 UADs and a PoCo, along with a MoTU. Not possible on a Mac.

I don't think there's any Mac based DAW user who would mind having an option to throw in 1-2 more HDDs for his/her sample
collection.
And I also don't think Logic users would be all too sad if audio track performance was finally on par with Cubase SX.
And finally I don't think I'd say anything different if I allready owned a Mac.

These requests should be raised as loud as possible, it's got nothing to do with "Macs vs. PCs" or so - but with the future of Logic
(and probably partially with the future of Apple as well).
You know, I actually don't even think the Apple takeover was all that much of a bad move for Logic - working closely along with the
OS programming company surely has its benefits... but so far IMO the deal hasn't shown its worth yet, and (unfortunately, believe
me, as a true Logic afficionado I wish it was any different) it doesn't seem to get all that much better, mainly due to the absence
of any Macs in the newcomer department, at least that's the result of my observations.

Fortunately for my own stuff I've got no problems in using 5.5.1./PC for quite a while longer (especially since I got Energy XT,
which has got to be THE enhancement for Logic/PC users), so my Mac lust is rather tamed right now.

However, sorry for the lengthy post - and again my apologies to the moderators. I know they're usually doing a great job.

Regards,
Sascha

Re: [EXS] Re: Goodbye

2005-06-06 by Eli Krantzberg

On Jun ,6, 2005, at 10:55 AM, Sascha Franck wrote:

> I'd like to comment on what Eli wrote (and I promise not to start a 
> platform war or whatsoever), [snip]
>
> . It *might* be different over there in america, but over here it 
> seems to be dwindling away from the
> market.

It does seem to me that Logic's marketing and distribution has always 
been less than stellar, right from the beginning. It seems it has 
always been hard for dealers to get product in a timely manner, etc. It 
therefore unfortunately has somewhat of a "second class" status as a 
result of this sort retail inertia. It's easier for dealers to get and 
sell Steinberg, Motu, and Cakewalk products.

But despite this, Logic seems to be alive and well and kicking around 
these parts (Eastern Canada). I guess there are regional differences. 
And yes, Apple seems to have more aggressive strategies for getting 
Macs into people's hands more easily in different parts of the world.

>  I know about quite some Apple efforts made in
> the USA, such as sponsoring media labs in schools, but this is rarely 
> happening over here - on the other hand almost each and every
> school over here (standard schools that is) allready has a PC-equipped 
> media lab, which of course might be used for music lessons as
> well.

A colleague of mine here is setting up and teaching an entry level 
recording program in  the music department of a local college. 
Hopefully he will get Logic and Macs in there one day. But they also 
are currently PC based.



--------
Eli Krantzberg
http://www.nightshiftorchestra.com
Almat Productions

[EXS] Re: Goodbye

2005-06-06 by markdvc2002

"Sascha Franck" <S.Franck@g...> wrote:

> First off, thanks for everybody's support, I really feel honored.
> After some research it seems that it was indeed just Yahoo acting up... but I never got 
any mailer daemon failure notifications or
> anything else, plus, some of my posts that didn't make contained some more or less 
"sneaky" side remarks towards Apple indeed, so I
> thought they were moderated.
> But then, it might've indeed only been some coincidence. So my sincere apologies to the 
moderators.

Hi Sascha

No problem AFAIC, I am quite relieved to read this, you had me very worried! FTR, if any 
posts ever do get rejected, the member will definitely get a reply with an explanation. 
Jeremy has a whole catalogue of fearsome punishments in store for any moderator who 
fails to do this - I won't go into details, there  could be underage readers ;-)

Is there anything specific you are aware of concerning whatever it is went wrong with your 
posts that we admins should know about and maybe take up with yahoo?

kind regards

Mark

Re: [EXS] Re: Goodbye

2005-06-06 by HKC

Sascha Franck wrote: But: How the most optimized audio sequencer, running on 
one of the most expensive computers isn't able to run half the audio tracks 
I can run on my 6 year old audio PC.

This has been mentioned a lot while Logics completely superior handling of 
plugins (compared with Cubase/Nuendo) doesn't really make many headlines. If 
it's a matter of either/or I would choose the ability to run a lot of 
plugins over 120 audio tracks anytime. Of course if it's possible to have 
both I'm all for that but I don't really run out of tracks although I do a 
fair bit of virtual streaming along with 30+ audiotracks all the time.

Re: [EXS] Re: Goodbye

2005-06-06 by Craig Beaumont

On 6/6/05 10:55 AM, "Sascha Franck" <S.Franck@...> wrote:


> But then, it might've indeed only been some coincidence. So my sincere
> apologies to the moderators.
> 
 Glad to hear you're staying...and demonstrating that you are as big a man
as I've often thought;-)
> 
> But: How the most optimized audio sequencer, running on one of the most
> expensive computers isn't able to run half the audio tracks
> I can run on my 6 year old audio PC (meanwhile serving as an office PC) is
> completely beyond my understanding (and yes, I did the
> comparisons myself).
> It also doesn't make it into my mind how you could only use 2 internal HDDs, 3
> PCI cards and one internal CD/DVD drive. Aren't HUGE
> sample libraries part of almost each and every audio production? Aren't DSP
> cards the tools of the trade these years? Aren't people
> copying CDs and DVDs 1:1 since ages without having to do images first?
> 
> No, I don't think this is senseless Apple "dissing" - actually more to the
> opposite. IMO this is criticism the folks in Cupertino
> should be aware of.
> PCs with up to 8 internal HDD connectors exist because there was a demand for
> it. You need to spend half of a fortune to get even
> only 4 HDDs connected to a Mac. Not to forget that FW busses still don't
> deliver the same performance as S-ATA/IDE ones.
> Also, I just configured a Nuendo based PC for a friend, he's using 2 UADs and
> a PoCo, along with a MoTU. Not possible on a Mac.
> 
VERY well said. As a powerbook/Logic user (and just bought one for my
college-bound daughter) I have balked at the idea of buying a G5 for those
very reasons. My hope has been that soon we can get ONE machine that will
meet the capabilities of the day, without having to spend a fortune on what
should have been a hardware option to begin with, or in putting together
silly nodes.

Craig Beaumont

Re: [EXS] Re: Goodbye

2005-06-06 by Paul Najar

On 07/06/2005, at 2:22 AM, HKC wrote:

> Sascha Franck wrote: But: How the most optimized audio sequencer, 
> running on
> one of the most expensive computers isn't able to run half the audio 
> tracks
> I can run on my 6 year old audio PC.
>
> This has been mentioned a lot while Logics completely superior 
> handling of
> plugins (compared with Cubase/Nuendo) doesn't really make many 
> headlines. If
> it's a matter of either/or I would choose the ability to run a lot of
> plugins over 120 audio tracks anytime. Of course if it's possible to 
> have
> both I'm all for that but I don't really run out of tracks although I 
> do a
> fair bit of virtual streaming along with 30+ audiotracks all the time.

Having made the jump from OS 9 to OS X on the same machine completely 
in the last 9 months I feel compelled to jump in here.

It is really obvious the difference in track count AND plugin handling 
between 9 & X. 9 running Logic 6.4 wins by an obvious margin in both 
areas.

 From what I've heard (read) recently, Tiger is a a somewhat more CPU 
efficient OS than Panther...? I'll bet it's still not back to the same 
efficinecy of OS  9.2.2.

Over a year ago I remember reading guys saying "you have to buy a G5 to 
run  OS X to have it feel like a G4 running OS 9.

Just thought I say this.....

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Paul Najar
Jaminajar Music Production
www.jaminajar.com

Re: [EXS] Re: Goodbye

2005-06-07 by Murray McDowall

Sascha Franck wrote:
>Fortunately for my own stuff I've got no problems in using 5.5.1./PC for 
>quite a while longer (especially since I got Energy XT,
>which has got to be THE enhancement for Logic/PC users), so my Mac lust is 
>rather tamed right now.

Hi Sascha,

Glad to hear things have been sorted out. I know it is getting a little off
topic but could you enlarge on the Energy XT/Logic PC thing - how do you
use these two together?

Regards,
Murray

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.