EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group

__

> yes i think this is how its meant to be. im not in front of logic right
> now, but isnt there a 'revert to original settings' option on the exs
> editor?

no, thats only for the "instrument settings" but not of the edits "inside"
...
if someone finds that revert command::please report!
((VERY nasty having to reboot logic in order to acces the original
instruments again!))

fz.

__

At 08:09 PM 7/23/01 +0200, you wrote:
>__
>
> > yes i think this is how its meant to be. im not in front of logic right
> > now, but isnt there a 'revert to original settings' option on the exs
> > editor?
>
>no, thats only for the "instrument settings" but not of the edits "inside"
>...
>if someone finds that revert command::please report!
>((VERY nasty having to reboot logic in order to acces the original
>instruments again!))

I have found this to be the case and it's annoying (especially when you are 
reverse engineering like I do).

Garth Hjelte
Sampler User

__
>>> yes i think this is how its meant to be. im not in front of logic right
>>> now, but isnt there a 'revert to original settings' option on the exs
>>> editor?

>> no, thats only for the "instrument settings" but not of the edits "inside"
>> ...
>> if someone finds that revert command::please report!
>> ((VERY nasty having to reboot logic in order to acces the original
>> instruments again!))

> I have found this to be the case and it's annoying (especially when you are
> reverse engineering like I do).

i think it may be called "bug" since i don't find any reason for being asked
if i want to safe changes if they are saved anyhow untill i quit logic being
asked again.

it happens that i am asked if i want to safe changes to
"MightBeTheInstrumentThatIMustHaveChangedThisMorningButCantRememberWhatIDidT
oIt" ...

bug!
cheers,
fz.
__