EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group

Gaggy . wrote:
> Wasn't here for long, so a delayed answer to the Win2K issue:

No problem ;-)

> I cannot believe that Emagic makes a professional sequener only for a really 
> non professional, very very unstable and annoying operating system (Win98) 

This depends. I am working for a value added reseller over here in Germany
and we hear _very_ different opinions on Windows 2000. Some have it running
fine, others have biiig problems with Win2K. Some even say it\ufffds much less
stable than Win98 (speaking of a clean, fresh install of course!).

Personally I don\ufffdt know how you come to the conclusion above: My Platinum
is performing great with Win98SE, crashes extremely seldom (probably less than
once a week due to very heavy usage sometimes _and_ despite using an AMD
processor).

> 5. Get The ZONE (Radium) version of LAP 4.6
>    and run it win Win2K without any
>    problems

HA-HA-HA :-))) Sorry that I laugh here, but _please_: You cannot be serious
about a crack performing better than the actual software!
Besides this, IMO this is not the forum to recommend or promote the usage of 
illegally cracked software.

> It's so sad, but that's the truth: Only the guys with the
> cracked version can use a "real" operating system
> together with LAP on a PC !

Urgh! "real" operating system? Win2K? After all the bugs reported?
Well, well, well - I don\ufffdt care if it\ufffds called Windows 3000 or
"Hypellium" or whatever _if_ it works. And Win98SE works like a charm
on my machine (and many others I know, too).

We\ufffdll wait on Service Pack 1 for Win2K and see...

> I think that can't be that illegal when
> you own the prog, isn't it ?

Ah, come on. You know _it is_ illegal, so why are you asking then?

Thomas

From: "Gaggy ." <gaggy01@...>
> I cannot believe that Emagic makes a professional sequener only for a
really
> non professional, very very unstable and annoying operating system (Win98)
> which completely blows up right in your face any time a plugin or
something
> else crashes down.
>
> The (My) suggested solution to this problem is:
>
> 1. Buy Logic Audio Platinum
> 2. Buy EXS-24
> 3. Buy ES-1
> 4. Put everything away, don't use it.
> 5. Get The ZONE (Radium) version of LAP 4.6
>    and run it win Win2K without any
>    problems
>
> It's so sad, but that's the truth: Only the guys with the
> cracked version can use a "real" operating system
> together with LAP on a PC !

No, the best solution is to continue working with 98/me
and wait a little more until Emagic releases a win2000 compliant
logic audio.

Me for first  want to run logic on win2000,
but reality is: you can do all of your music work on 98/me
right now with no hassles. Win ME runs particularly well btw.


Andrea

> Urgh! "real" operating system? Win2K? After all the bugs reported?

Who care for _reported_ bugs when it's running stable ? And it is.

> We´ll wait on Service Pack 1 for Win2K and see...

Why wait ? It's out since a few months.

--
    Regards & Gruesse from Mickey @ http://www.Vanille.de
  ---------------------------------------------------------
  How could anyone know me - when I don't even know myself ?

> No, the best solution is to continue working with 98/me
> and wait a little more until Emagic releases a win2000 compliant
> logic audio.

yeah... a little more... haha... I'm waiting since several years for
that... (yes, i know, win2000 is not several years old... substitute
it with nt4) :-(

--
    Regards & Gruesse from Mickey @ http://www.Vanille.de
  ---------------------------------------------------------
  How could anyone know me - when I don't even know myself ?

Michael Lauer wrote:
> Who care for _reported_ bugs when it's running stable ? And it is.

Well, that\ufffds your experience, but believe me we know a lot of people
who have totally different feelings about Win2K.

Still my point was: Why do we complain about LAW not running on Win2K
when it really works fine on Win98SE? Isn\ufffdt our job to create music
rather then installing new OS versions?

...just my personal point of view.

Thomas

BTW: Emagic have repeatedly told that they are indeed working on a
Win2K version of Logic, so all I would suggest is to be patient. Even
if it takes longer than expected it is sure that a Win2K version will
come (Emagic can\ufffdt take the risk of not having it).

Look on www.tomshardware.com

On Tom's site he claims that Win98SE outperforms
WinME. Just adding my piece!!

Cory Dean