Mailist to discuss all issues regarding the Digitech GSP-2101 Guitar FX Processor group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Mailist to discuss all issues regarding the Digitech GSP-2101 Guitar FX Processor

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:25 UTC

Message

Re: [gsp-2101] GSP

2001-10-17 by Deathchicken

And the GNX must be at least 10 years newer. Seems as though the sounds haven't advanced that much.....
;
In response to that, Aaron... Word. I have the Genesis3 and I don't think it's necessarily the 2101 of desktop recording... It's sweet but the 2101 is a far better FX processor even without YaYa and Synth Talk.
----- Original Message -----
From: Aaron
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 10:15 PM
Subject: Re: [gsp-2101] GSP

I agree, its quite an awesome piece. I just picked up Digitech's new GNX2 to test out. For $450, the thing is cool, but I have to say that the GSP sounds just as good. And the GNX must be at least 10 years newer. Seems as though the sounds haven't advanced that much.....

Deathchicken wrote:

For the money, ( ABOUT $250 ON EBAY OR LESS ) you cannot beat it. The only thing I have heard that was better was a Mesa Boogie Triaxis. The Marshall JMP 1 is alright too... As for all-in-wonders though. I've not heard anything since the 2101 ( that you can buy for under $400 ) that sounds nearly as good. Especially if you put good tubes in it.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 6:08 PM
Subject: [gsp-2101] GSP
guys, any comment with the GSP 2101 tube-effects processor? i'm interested to buy one...but still get confused by any comments from my friend...need a help Ferdi

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
gsp-2101-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
gsp-2101-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.