Mailist to discuss all issues regarding the Digitech GSP-2101 Guitar FX Processor group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Mailist to discuss all issues regarding the Digitech GSP-2101 Guitar FX Processor

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:25 UTC

Thread

GSP

GSP

2001-10-15 by Ferdiansyah

guys, any comment with the GSP 2101 tube-effects processor? i'm interested to buy one...but still get confused by any comments from my friend...need a help
Ferdi

RE: [gsp-2101] GSP

2001-10-16 by Chris Sherwood

From: Ferdiansyah [mailto:ferdian@...]
guys, any comment with the GSP 2101 tube-effects processor? i'm interested to buy one...but still get confused by any comments from my friend...need a help
Do you have any questions? How would you use it? Do you like to program your own patches?
Chris

Re: [gsp-2101] GSP

2001-10-17 by Aaron

I agree, its quite an awesome piece.  I just picked up Digitech's new
GNX2 to test out.  For $450, the thing is cool, but I have to say that
the GSP sounds just as good.  And the GNX must be at least 10 years
newer.  Seems as though the sounds haven't advanced that much.....

Deathchicken wrote:

> For the money, ( ABOUT $250 ON EBAY OR LESS ) you cannot beat it.
> The only thing I have heard that was better was a Mesa Boogie
> Triaxis. The Marshall JMP 1 is alright too... As for all-in-wonders
> though. I've not heard anything since the 2101 ( that you can buy
> for under $400 ) that sounds nearly as good. Especially if you put
> good tubes in it.
>
>      ----- Original Message -----
>      From: Ferdiansyah
>      To: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com
>      Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 6:08 PM
>      Subject: [gsp-2101] GSP
>       guys, any comment with the GSP 2101 tube-effects
>      processor? i'm interested to buy one...but still get
>      confused by any comments from my friend...need a
>      help Ferdi
>
>      To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>      gsp-2101-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
>      Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
>      of Service.
>
>
>                    Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
                        ADVERTISEMENT
                            [Image]
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> gsp-2101-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Re: [gsp-2101] GSP

2001-10-17 by Deathchicken

For the money, ( ABOUT $250 ON EBAY OR LESS ) you cannot beat it. The only thing I have heard that was better was a Mesa Boogie Triaxis. The Marshall JMP 1 is alright too... As for all-in-wonders though. I've not heard anything since the 2101 ( that you can buy for under $400 ) that sounds nearly as good. Especially if you put good tubes in it.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 6:08 PM
Subject: [gsp-2101] GSP

guys, any comment with the GSP 2101 tube-effects processor? i'm interested to buy one...but still get confused by any comments from my friend...need a help
Ferdi


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
gsp-2101-unsubscribe@egroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Re: [gsp-2101] GSP

2001-10-17 by Deathchicken

And the GNX must be at least 10 years newer. Seems as though the sounds haven't advanced that much.....
;
In response to that, Aaron... Word. I have the Genesis3 and I don't think it's necessarily the 2101 of desktop recording... It's sweet but the 2101 is a far better FX processor even without YaYa and Synth Talk.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: Aaron
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 10:15 PM
Subject: Re: [gsp-2101] GSP

I agree, its quite an awesome piece. I just picked up Digitech's new GNX2 to test out. For $450, the thing is cool, but I have to say that the GSP sounds just as good. And the GNX must be at least 10 years newer. Seems as though the sounds haven't advanced that much.....

Deathchicken wrote:

For the money, ( ABOUT $250 ON EBAY OR LESS ) you cannot beat it. The only thing I have heard that was better was a Mesa Boogie Triaxis. The Marshall JMP 1 is alright too... As for all-in-wonders though. I've not heard anything since the 2101 ( that you can buy for under $400 ) that sounds nearly as good. Especially if you put good tubes in it.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 6:08 PM
Subject: [gsp-2101] GSP
guys, any comment with the GSP 2101 tube-effects processor? i'm interested to buy one...but still get confused by any comments from my friend...need a help Ferdi

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
gsp-2101-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
gsp-2101-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Re: [gsp-2101] GSP

2001-10-17 by Aaron

Yeah, I totally agree.  Cool, new, but nothing special.

I'm still looking for that one box that does it all.  I thought this
new GNX would have done it.
Don't get me wrong, I really like my GSP2101.  No upgrades, no PPC or
SDISC card, just the plane-jane 1.0 version.  It's cool, but I was
just looking for something different that just totally blew me away.
I was looking at the TC Electronics G-Force, but that doesn't seem to
have a pre-amp in it.  $1000 for just effects?  Whew.......

Guess I'll keep looking.  Maybe I'll just send up with the Johnson
J-Station for $149 for the recording setup.

Deathchicken wrote:

>  And the GNX must be at least 10 years newer.  Seems as though the
> sounds haven't advanced that much..... In response to that, Aaron...
> Word. I have the Genesis3 and I don't think it's necessarily the
> 2101 of desktop recording... It's sweet but the 2101 is a far better
> FX processor even without YaYa and Synth Talk.
>
>      ----- Original Message -----
>      From: Aaron
>      To: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com
>      Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 10:15 PM
>      Subject: Re: [gsp-2101] GSP
>       I agree, its quite an awesome piece.  I just picked up
>      Digitech's new GNX2 to test out.  For $450, the thing is
>      cool, but I have to say that the GSP sounds just as good.
>      And the GNX must be at least 10 years newer.  Seems as
>      though the sounds haven't advanced that much.....
>
>      Deathchicken wrote:
>
>     > For the money, ( ABOUT $250 ON EBAY OR LESS ) you cannot
>     > beat it. The only thing I have heard that was better was
>     > a Mesa Boogie Triaxis. The Marshall JMP 1 is alright
>     > too... As for all-in-wonders though. I've not heard
>     > anything since the 2101 ( that you can buy for under
>     > $400 ) that sounds nearly as good. Especially if you put
>     > good tubes in it.
>     >
>     >      ----- Original Message -----
>     >      From: Ferdiansyah
>     >      To: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com
>     >      Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 6:08 PM
>     >      Subject: [gsp-2101] GSP
>     >       guys, any comment with the GSP 2101
>     >      tube-effects processor? i'm interested to buy
>     >      one...but still get confused by any comments
>     >      from my friend...need a help Ferdi
>     >
>     >      To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
>     >      to:
>     >      gsp-2101-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >      Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
>     >      Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>     >
>     > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>     > gsp-2101-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
>     > of Service.
>
>
>                    Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
                        ADVERTISEMENT
                            [Image]
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> gsp-2101-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.