MM wrote:
I think it\ufffds exactly the opposite. The 2112 was \ufffddumbed down\ufffd for musicians who didn\ufffdt want to spend the time programming the unit. It however has better sound quality due to newer electronics. (Although the beloved 2101 sounds awesome to my ears). The 2120/2112 have some way to mix solid state and tube distortions though.-----Original Message-----
From: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com [mailto:gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of jim morrison
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 9:07 AM
To: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [gsp-2101] 2101 and 2112 in comparison
from what i understand? the 2112 has alot of cool features,but lacks the bottomline tone that the 2101 has(ie digitech went for more bells and whistles and managed to screw up the intial most important stuff (ie tone) in laymens terms? the 2101's are deffinately more desirable even though they were made earlier than the 2101's
MM hotmail.com> wrote:2101 more flexible. 2112 better converters. I own 2 2101\ufffds w/ ppc (and 0 2112\ufffds)-----Original Message-----
From: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com [mailto:gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of belphedeus
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 5:32 AM
To: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [gsp-2101] 2101 and 2112 in comparisonHi guys i just wanna hear your input between the GSP2101(V3.0a w/PPC)
and the 2112.
Which do you prefer and why.What are the main diferences between these
two product?
Cheers would really like to hear from your point of view and
opinions.Thanks!Choose the right car based on your needs. Check out Yahoo! Autos new Car Finder tool.
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.