Mailist to discuss all issues regarding the Digitech GSP-2101 Guitar FX Processor

Interesting.

And, I'm using two 2x1's and two 4x3's.

I forgot to mention that I'm also using two mono delays and a 3-band parametric EQ. Pretty silly of me.

Here is what my flanger algorithm looks like:
http://www.svachon.com/alg.png

--- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, M M <strategy400@...> wrote:
>
> 
> How many and what type of mixers? Because assuming 3 4X2 gives 176 cpu blocks.
> 
>  
> 
> IMPORTANT: When you start building your own Algorithms, remember that CPU and
> RAM block counts are approximate. It is normal to run out of blocks even
> your math says you have a few blocks still available. Also, every Algorithm
> automatically requires about 28 CPU blocks for the master mix control and
> miscellaneous input and output routing. This gives you about 228 CPU blocks
> to work with (484 CPU blocks on a PPC-210 equipped GSP-2101 Artist).
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>  "Never put off till tomorrow what you can ignore entirely."
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> To: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com
> From: prometh@...
> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:30:19 +0000
> Subject: [gsp-2101] Re: Flanger fits but not Phaser?
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks for the response, guys.
> 
> My algorithm is very simple, being comprised of a reverb (30 blocks) and a few mixers (0 RAM). Adding a phaser (2 blocks) should only bring the memory usage up to 32 blocks and shouldn't be an issue considering an algorithm has a max of 256.
> 
> Additionally, my algorithm in "2101 Edit" shows that I have a lot of RAM left to work with.
> 
> --- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, Marko Menart <okramtranem@> wrote:
> >
> > If you're doing this in "Dual Alg" (both S-Discs) algorithm, that means that one of S-Discs is full so you have to move effect (or few) to the other S-Disc. Be careful of the right fx order in a signal chain.
> > 
> > Best regards, Marko
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > From: Steven Vachon <prometh@>
> > To: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Mon, June 28, 2010 8:51:25 PM
> > Subject: [gsp-2101] Flanger fits but not Phaser?
> > 
> > 
> > According to the manual, phasers uses less CPU than that of flangers. My current algorithm fits a stereo flanger perfectly, but when I delete it and try to add a stereo phaser, it claims that it "won't fit". Is this a bug that can be worked around, or... ? Thanks
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  		 	   		  
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox.
> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
>