Well, considering my algorithm ( http://www.svachon.com/alg.png ), it would be:
97 RAM blocks and 223 CPU blocks with the stereo flanger
and
80 RAM blocks and 221 CPU blocks with the stereo phaser
Why would the flanger work and not the phaser?
>
>
> 167 cpu blocks then.
>
>
>
> "Never put off till tomorrow what you can ignore entirely."
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com
> From: prometh@...
> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:33:10 +0000
> Subject: [gsp-2101] Re: Flanger fits but not Phaser?
>
>
>
>
>
> Interesting.
>
> And, I'm using two 2x1's and two 4x3's
>
> --- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, M M strategy400@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > How many and what type of mixers? Because assuming 3 4X2 gives 176 cpu blocks.
> >
> >
> >
> > IMPORTANT: When you start building your own Algorithms, remember that CPU and
> > RAM block counts are approximate. It is normal to run out of blocks even
> > your math says you have a few blocks still available. Also, every Algorithm
> > automatically requires about 28 CPU blocks for the master mix control and
> > miscellaneous input and output routing. This gives you about 228 CPU blocks
> > to work with (484 CPU blocks on a PPC-210 equipped GSP-2101 Artist).
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Never put off till tomorrow what you can ignore entirely."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com
> > From: prometh@
> > Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:30:19 +0000
> > Subject: [gsp-2101] Re: Flanger fits but not Phaser?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >;
> > Thanks for the response, guys.
> >
> > My algorithm is very simple, being comprised of a reverb (30 blocks) and a few mixers (0 RAM). Adding a phaser (2 blocks) should only bring the memory usage up to 32 blocks and shouldn't be an issue considering an algorithm has a max of 256.
> >
> > Additionally, my algorithm in "2101 Edit" shows that I have a lot of RAM left to work with.
> >
> > --- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, Marko Menart > > >
> > > If you're doing this in "Dual Alg" (both S-Discs) algorithm, that means that one of S-Discs is full so you have to move effect (or few) to the other S-Disc. Be careful of the right fx order in a signal chain.
> > >
> > > Best regards, Marko
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Steven Vachon
> >; > To: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Mon, June 28, 2010 8:51:25 PM
> > > Subject: [gsp-2101] Flanger fits but not Phaser?
> > >
> > >
> > > According to the manual, phasers uses less CPU than that of flangers. My current algorithm fits a stereo flanger perfectly, but when I delete it and try to add a stereo phaser, it claims that it "won't fit". Is this a bug that can be worked around, or... ? Thanks
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________________
> > Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox.
> > http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3
>