Mailist to discuss all issues regarding the Digitech GSP-2101 Guitar FX Processor

Hello? Anyone? Please read my previous message as it sums up the ram and cpu values

--- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, "Steven Vachon" <prometh@...> wrote:
>
> Well, considering my algorithm ( http://www.svachon.com/alg.png ), it
> would be:
> 97 RAM blocks and 223 CPU blocks with the stereo flanger
> and
> 80 RAM blocks and 221 CPU blocks with the stereo phaser
> 
> 
> Why would the flanger work and not the phaser?
> 
> --- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, M M <strategy400@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > 167 cpu blocks then.
> >
> >
> >
> >  "Never put off till tomorrow what you can ignore entirely."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com
> > From: prometh@
> > Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:33:10 +0000
> > Subject: [gsp-2101] Re: Flanger fits but not Phaser?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Interesting.
> >
> > And, I'm using two 2x1's and two 4x3's
> >
> > --- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, M M strategy400@ wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > How many and what type of mixers? Because assuming 3 4X2 gives 176
> cpu blocks.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > IMPORTANT: When you start building your own Algorithms, remember
> that CPU and
> > > RAM block counts are approximate. It is normal to run out of blocks
> even
> > > your math says you have a few blocks still available. Also, every
> Algorithm
> > > automatically requires about 28 CPU blocks for the master mix
> control and
> > > miscellaneous input and output routing. This gives you about 228 CPU
> blocks
> > > to work with (484 CPU blocks on a PPC-210 equipped GSP-2101 Artist).
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Never put off till tomorrow what you can ignore entirely."
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com
> > > From: prometh@
> > > Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:30:19 +0000
> > > Subject: [gsp-2101] Re: Flanger fits but not Phaser?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for the response, guys.
> > >
> > > My algorithm is very simple, being comprised of a reverb (30 blocks)
> and a few mixers (0 RAM). Adding a phaser (2 blocks) should only bring
> the memory usage up to 32 blocks and shouldn't be an issue considering
> an algorithm has a max of 256.
> > >
> > > Additionally, my algorithm in "2101 Edit" shows that I have a lot of
> RAM left to work with.
> > >
> > > --- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, Marko Menart <okramtranem@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > If you're doing this in "Dual Alg" (both S-Discs) algorithm, that
> means that one of S-Discs is full so you have to move effect (or few) to
> the other S-Disc. Be careful of the right fx order in a signal chain.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards, Marko
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: Steven Vachon <prometh@>
> > > > To: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Sent: Mon, June 28, 2010 8:51:25 PM
> > > > Subject: [gsp-2101] Flanger fits but not Phaser?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > According to the manual, phasers uses less CPU than that of
> flangers. My current algorithm fits a stereo flanger perfectly, but when
> I delete it and try to add a stereo phaser, it claims that it "won't
> fit". Is this a bug that can be worked around, or... ? Thanks
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________________
> > > Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more
> from your inbox.
> > >
> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:\
> ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your
> inbox.
> >
> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:\
> ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3
> >
>