Mailist to discuss all issues regarding the Digitech GSP-2101 Guitar FX Processor group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Mailist to discuss all issues regarding the Digitech GSP-2101 Guitar FX Processor

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:25 UTC

Message

RE: [gsp-2101] Re: Flanger fits but not Phaser?

2010-07-07 by M M

Send me your PPC 210 card for "inspection".

"Never put off till tomorrow what you can ignore entirely."




To: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com
From: prometh@...
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 16:21:13 +0000
Subject: [gsp-2101] Re: Flanger fits but not Phaser?

I don't want other patches.

From what [bigmarkm65] told me, I'm left with a max of 228 CPU blocks (since 28 blocks are used for master mix and routing).

My flanger algorithm works out to 223 CPU blocks (and 97 RAM blocks).

Swapping the flanger for a phaser would add up to 221 CPU blocks (and 80 RAM blocks).

I realize that the numbers are approximate, but unless Digitech screwed up on the differences between a flanger and a phaser in all versions of the manual, it should fit. Knowing that, I won't quit. Clearly I've RTFM and listened to things said here.

Thank you. I await intelligent responses.


--- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, M M ...> wrote:
>
>
> If the phaser don't fit, you must uh... quit.
>
>
>
> My wit knows no bounds...
>
>
>
> One thing though, I have some great sounding phaser patches. Can't see why all the difficulty. Send your unit to a tech for a checkup maybe.
>
>
>
> Maybe it's the nut behind the guitar...
>
> "Never put off till tomorrow what you can ignore entirely."
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com
> From: prometh@...
> Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 15:18:28 +0000
> Subject: [gsp-2101] Re: Flanger fits but not Phaser?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The only reason I posted another message was because someone had posted spam which could cause one to easily ignore my message. I do not demand, I simply request. Demanding would make me a jerk like you. Thanks for replying without reading my question.
>
>
> If anyone else has read this far [probably not], please check out my other message. I have RTFM and have added up the numbers (RAM, CPU). I don't ask for help without first attempting to figure it out on my own. Thank you.
>
>
>
> --- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, "cheeseburgy" netman@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello Steven. Please RTFM. Unfortunately, it requires some time, effort and thought to do so. If you haven't been successful here in attempting to get a satisfactory answer, either a) no one has your answer, b) no one has time to answer, or read the manual for you, or c) no one appreciates the way that you demand answers, and are purposely ignoring you due to your ignorance and obvious lack of proper etiquette. In any case, RTFM.
> >
>; > And have a nice day!
> >
> >
> > --- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, "Steven Vachon" prometh@ wrote:
> >; >
> > > Hello? Anyone? Please read my previous message as it sums up the ram and cpu values
> > >
> > > --- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, "Steven Vachon" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Well, considering my algorithm ( http://www.svachon.com/alg.png ), it
> > > > would be:
> > > > 97 RAM blocks and 223 CPU blocks with the stereo flanger
> > > > and
> > > > 80 RAM blocks and 221 CPU blocks with the stereo phaser
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Why would the flanger work and not the phaser?
> > > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1
>



The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Get started.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.