--- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, "ryan" <nonpoint28376@y...> wrote: > Does anyone use the 2101 with like a podxt or the pod amp modelor or > the pod amp simulator or even the vox amp modelor. If so could > anyone tell me what they think. > Regards > Ryan I own a 2101 I will not part with. I have owned an original POD which I updated to 2.0 and later sold- I did not like the OS or the sound. I also use a GNX2 a lot-I love the sounds and the OS, but you do need to edit your own sounds. The presets mostly suck. I like to be able to edit sounds equally well on the unit or on a computer. I also own a Vox Tonelab SE pedalboard. I do not use any of them together- it's either or. The 2101 is amazingly warm & good sounding-using the XLR outs-to a recording system (VS-1880). I love its clean, chorused, and distortion sounds, but I do not want to move a rack anymore, so it is a studio toy only. If I was willing to move all that stuff, it would be a great live rig, too. The GNX2 is like my swiss army knife. It is great with my '83 Fender Concert (tube) amp as a small rig that will do anything I need. It is digital sounding by itself, but through a tube amp it warms up nicely. It works OK in the studio, but the 2101 is better. I also like its programmable toe switch wah, which I can add to any patch, and go wah wah from any patch by stepping forward all the way. I bought the Vox Tonelab SE this year. Its modeling stuff does not impress me much, but it does the Marshall and Vox and wah sounds really well. Think Aerosmith,AC/DC,Beatles, Hendrix, or Lynrd Skynrd. The wah is very programmable & cool sounding, but no toe switch?. I am having trouble with its clean tones breaking up too much for me. I like clean tones to be crystal clean with no dirt, even if I play hard on the guitar, and it does not do that. At least not that i can figure out. So thay all work, but for different stuff and different situations, each one might be better the the others.
Message
Re: GSP 2101 and amp modelors.
2004-09-20 by Gerry ODowd
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.