Of course, my previous email was the preamble to something else, which I forget actually to include. I have a notoriously poor memory, so this doesn't surprise me... Sequencer Enhancement Idea: Two ideas, really. Don't know how practical either is, but one, or both, would be very cool. 1. A dedicated '303-style' bassline sequencer mode. Switching to this mode would automatically drop the current sound into Portamento Mono mode, and set the filter envelope to a simple Attack Decay mode (which could be done by overiding the patch's existing Breakpoint, Slope and Sustain settings). In addition, this new mode would allow slide notes to be added to the current sequencer step with a special keypress. This would slide from the previous note to the current one. Also, you'd be able to add accents to the current note by pressing another keypad key. Accented notes wouldn't necessarily have to be louder, but I'd envisage them (as in the tb-303), having a tighter filter envelope decay, increased filter env.mod, and maybe slightly higher resonance and cutoff values. It might also be cool to add the accent function outlined above to an additional Bassline key mode, so that note velocities above a settable threshold would trigger the accent effect. In either case, you'd be able to set the accent amount. 2. A more generalised ability to record arbitrary parameter settings per-sequencer-step. In this mode, any edits made to parameter settings while in sequencer write mode would be recorded with the current step, and would be played-back at the same time as any notes recorded. This would allow all kinds of cool sequenced timbral effects, especially is the ability to record just parameter-changes (and no note data) was added. That way, you could play any notes you wanted, and have the synth parameters automated by the sequencer. I realise both these options (but particularly the 2nd one) would greatly increase the memory demands of the sequencer, so I'd be perfectly willing to accept a cut in the number of available sequencer steps from the current 256 to, say, 32, or even 16, if this helps at all. Anyone any thoughts on whether the above would be desirable? I'm aware that the Poly/EX-800 is never going to make a particularly convincing tb-303 emulator, but the Slide and Accent features of the original bassline box still sound amazing, even when applied to a different basic sound. Option 2 is admittedly a little more ambitious, but if it's possible, would open up all kinds of cool possibilities. Cheers guys, a|x
Message
Hawk-800 Feature Idea
2008-11-11 by Alex Drinkwater
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.