At 12:54 AM -0700 10/5/01, Wilson Zorn wrote:
>Guys, before we get too upset, just because this is an OT list, that doesn't
>mean that it's necessarily any and all subjects.
>
>And there are lot sof OT lists that while OT, there's a "range" of OT so to
>speak that's allowable. Many OT lists do not intend to see politics and
>such.
>
>Although I do like that this OT list is totally broad and I thank Joeri for
>that, I don't think it's unfair for someone to campaign to us individually
>to try to get us to think differently about its use.
Yeah but writing someone to tell them that all their mail goes in
your trash and to stop posting things that are not of interest to you
is not polite. It is also strange that someone would take it upon
themselves to try to define the breadth of "Off Topic".
Also what is it that we are supposed to think differently about? As
I understand it this is a group of people who by sharing their
experience with a certain product have somewhere along the road
gotten the idea that they are interested in each other enough to
share their views on other matters as well. So that we could do
this without interfering with the functioning of the LUG Joeri was
kind enough to create a forum for that to happen. Who is Frank
Koistra to come in here and tell us what we should or should not be
talking about.
--
Dennis Gunn
Mightyjohn@...
check out MIGHTY JOHN HENRY's album "hot air head"
info at
http://www.twics.com/~mightyjo/home.htmlMessage
Re: [L-OT] Re: logic OT- this message is very strange.
2001-10-06 by Dennis Gunn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.