<koolmusick@...>wrote: [snip] >One thing is certain though. If anybody wants to set up a new economic >order then they are going to have to come up with a better predictive and >economic model than Smith's because whatever may be its faults the Adam >Smith model allows governments to make plans and bring about results. As >the Communists found out to their cost, governments that cannot deliver on >the promises they make are in the end in serious trouble. But ... for as >long as Western governments can deliver results on the promises that they >make (and what they always promise is that those who believe in the system >they propagate will be better off tomorrow than they are today) then for so >long will they have a method for making sure that the system continues in >existence and that others also want to copy it. It is likely that the Smith >model will only break down for one of two reasons: (a) a better model comes >along; and (b) consumers indicate that the premise of uncertain knowledge >is no longer an acceptable way of doing business and conducting economic >affairs. > >We seem to be living in such an age. > Thanks for taking the time and effort to write this. S.
Message
Re: [L-OT] OT^2 - Thanks
2001-10-09 by Spectro
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.