>I've noticed that people from repressive regimes often think there is a >conspiracy in everything. I think the "American agenda" is to maintain >stability in the region and prevent world terror. Maybe that's why America has a habit of supporting and financing the most brutal dictatures in the world, including the Taliban regime until recently ? According to some, the "American agenda" is very obvious : - control the pipelines between Central Asia republics and Indian ocean - install military bases so that they can balance Russia and China, which in the long run are their main obstacles for world domination - fight recession by militarization of the economy - break all anti-imperialist resistance in the world. In light of this it makes perfect sense to finance terrorism because it gives you a good reason to intervene militarily. Similarly, it is said that Saddam Hussein invaded Koweit only because Americans assured him that they wouldn't react. Similarly, it is said that Churchill allowed the state of Israel to be created in Palestine because he knew it would cause a tension such that England would be "forced" to intervene militarily, preventing Palistine to become independant (following other English colonies) and leave England's sphere of influence. I don't know if all this is true, but to me it doesn't sound more crazy than USA fighting for freedom all around the world. >Spectro-bin-Laden wrote Anything goes >Primitive people always ascribe God to anything they can't >understand or control. The most "primitive people" are the ones who believe there is such a thing as "primitive people".
Message
Re: [L-OT] Locusts for Dinner
2001-10-11 by Vincent Kenis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.