>No, the biggest difference is that digital is a sampled-time system, which >means that it's subject to time aliasing (usually just called aliasing). >It's truly a challenge to make something sound close to it's analog >counterpart while sampling at just above the hearing threshold (<24KHz >bandwidth in a 48KHz system). I was just reading an AES paper on how a >decent peak limiter would need a 6MHz sample rate to keep aliasing noise to >inaudible levels.... these days I guess that's a practicality, what with >2GHz Pentiums.... What is the justification given for such a high rate? and what exactly would one be sampling at that rate? I'm curious... S.
Message
Re: [L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better
2001-11-06 by Spectro