> From: Spectro <spectro@...> > > What is the justification given for such a high rate? and what > exactly would one be sampling at that rate? I'm curious... Check out this months' AES journal for the whole scoop... basically the guy plotted aliasing noise vs. sample rate vs. clip level for a dual-tone input, and the aliasing dropped to an acceptable level (around -120dB) at about 6MHz sample rate. Whenever you clip a waveform (with a non-linear mapping function - there are a couple of plugins that you can do this with), you introduce distortion, sidebands, however you analyze it. Simply put, with a simple clipper, you get odd-order harmonics with amplitudes falling proportionally. Those will then alias based on their frequency relative to the sample frequency. So if you raise the sample frequency, by the time you get to harmonics that start aliasing, their amplitude is sufficiently low to be inaudible.
Message
Re: [L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better
2001-11-06 by marc lindahl
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.