Kool, I begin to see where you're coming from... > The general principles I was referring to were things like 'be kind to your > neighbour' which it's good to think about from time to time in order to > find out if you're actually doing it. When not enough people treat their > neighbour Muslims or neighbour Jews or neighbour 'Wily Oriental Gentlemen' > with a sufficient degree of humanity, then we have a major social problem > which can only be addressed by each individual person lifting up the nose > from the mire and examining their own actions a bit. Plus ... passing a few > laws about discrimination in the work place and in public places doesn't go > amiss either. That's what I was referring to. Fine. 100% agreement from moi. >> great stuff for journalists and politicians to >> make a fine hash of and get everyone confused. > As above, not what I was referring to ... except that sometimes passing a > few laws and banging a few heads is a pretty good way to go about things. Agreed, Though getting laws into practice in people's lives can be a wholly different game - as in our currently rather silly drugs laws. It takes individuals to be aware of issues and to be seen to be aware of issues by other individuals. > And ... sometimes a newly passed law gets some > publicity so that people can understand that everyone is deadly serious > about this and they'd better shape up smartish or there'll be some jail > time for them. People like Steven Lawrence still getting killed, though. Or > ... would you rather we rolled the clocks back and repealed all them laws > that make sure that when I go round your neighbour's flat to check it out > cause I'm thinking of renting it and he doesn't feel like renting it out to > a Wily Oriental Gentleman he can just do so and face no consequences? Would > that be preferable? Never said or implied any such thing. I was talking about the welter of stuff generated in the modern world by the media, pollsters, thinktanks, commercial companies on all kinds of issues sometimes far from the life and death things you're addressing there, followed by a Channel 4 documentary which glibly says 'something must be done'. What I'm saying is that there is so much information thrown at people that we suffocate under it and lose track of the important things. It is also presented to us in a way which generally encourages people to feel helpless and demand that someone else do something. If you actually examine the journalism or the TV reporting they can often use the same presentation techniques whether it's deaths of black people in police custody, problems in the mortgage industry or double-booking at Spanish holiday resorts. Sometimes it has to be someone else doing something, in the case of regulating the rail industry for example, or obviously in the case of Stephen Lawrence getting the police and judicial system to address their severe shortcomings and actually protect and support citizens of all backgrounds, creeds, racial origin etc. But there are many issues out there which cannot simply be addressed by yet another new regulatory authority or voluntary or mandatory code of practice. They need individuals to take responsibility. Sometimes lines are hard to draw. Here's an example in miniature off the top of my head about individual and group action. I'm a member of the Music Producers Guild here in the UK and a member of the Education Committee as a former lecturer in Music Tech. We had a number of emails come in from bands from various parts of the world looking to publicise themselves and maybe find a sympathetic producer, with links to websites in the emails, which were forwarded to members as soon as received. I clicked on one Florida-based rock band link just out of curiosity to find that they used an awful lot of neo-Nazi imagery. I therefore emailed the MPG office to say what had been forwarded and to point out that : 1) emails with links like this might put us two mouse clicks away from the Aryan Nations or somebody equally nasty and stupid. Who knows where some nervous legislator might take that? Might get us into some sort of trouble with politicians not understanding the nature of the Internet. 2) Much more importantly this material was bound to be offensive to ethnic minority (and other) members of the MPG and other people in the music business. 3) We could do with recruiting more ethnic minority members and ought to be positively seeking them out and making them feel welcome and secure in the MPG. This caused much more of a storm than I had anticipated, with some people getting into quite a nervous frame of mind and others angrily saying it was getting into politics and areas of free speech which we shouldn't mess with as not part of our brief. It ended up with a general disclaimer being put on any forwarded emails saying that MPG did not take responsibility for the contents. I haven't had any forwarded emails for a while anyhow. In this case I felt quite 'legislative' in one sense, in that I felt that we should make more of a statement of intent on these issues and also that we should as a group make more of a specific attempt to reach black and ethnic minority engineers and producers (though we have some strong active members in these 'categories'. I didn't want anybody (in fact there wasn't anybody) to have to laboriously plod through and censor all the emails and links, which is taking the 'legislative' approach too far; nor did I want bands and artists not to be able to use this way of reaching people. I would rather that we were upfront about being inclusive and hope that would help to bring the right people to us and keep the wrong people away. We could have all the mission statements you like in bold print and it still wouldn't make any difference if individuals acted in racist ways to other individuals. That's their responsibility. But I do favour making the statement as a way of keeping the issue in front of individuals. Does that make my POV any clearer? I see limits in the ability of the group to make any difference here, but to me there is a group responsibility as well as an individual responsibility. Time to give this keyboard a rest... Tony T
Message
Who's responsible?
2001-11-06 by Tony Thompson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.