Thoughts from the mind of Lars Vik, 08-11-2001:
> >The answer may surprise you, and puts a nice upper
>>boundary on the "sensible number of decimals of pi
>>you'll ever need".
>
>But how many decimals do you need? Just interested... You know, nice
>thing to know when you check up girls or things like that...! It's
>Wednesday, but still...
Let's suppose the speed of light is 3 * 10^8 m/s (it's actually a bit
less, but that doesn't matter for the outcome).
So in one year light travels
3 * 10^8 * 60 * 60 * 24 * 365 meters = 9.4608 * 10^15 m = 1 lightyear (approx)
So 1 billion lightyears is times 10^9: 9.4608 * 10^24 m
Expressed in 0.1 mm units (i.e. times 10^4) gives 9.4608 * 10^28.
So the diameter of the proposed circle is 9.4608 * 10^28, where the
unit is 0.1 mm -- a 29-digit number. Let's call this number A.
The circumference of a circle is pi*diameter.
Now suppose we knew pi in zero decimal places -- i.e. pi = 3.
Then A*pi = 2.838.. * 10^29
Now we take pi with 1 decimal place: pi=3.1
Then A*pi = 2.932.. * 10^29
Now we take pi with 2 decimal place: pi=3.14
Then A*pi = 2.970.. * 10^29
Ditto, 3 places (3.142) gives 2.97258... * 10^29
With pi=3.1415 we get 2.97211... * 10^29
So with 0 decimals, we see that the "2" part is OK but the rest is
wrong (as can be seen from the following calculations which give
2.9... instead of 2.8...). With 1 decimal we get 2.9, but the rest
is still wrong (ditto: it should be 2.97... instead of 2.93... as cab
be seen from subsequent calculations).
Etcetera: each time we add a decimal in pi, we gain (not
surprisingly) 1 position of accuracy.
0 decimals: 1 digit of accuracy. 1 decimal: 2 digits of accuracy.
Etc. So in order to get 29 digits of accuracy (since our unit was
already 0.1 mm) we need 28 decimals of pi. To be on the safe side,
we simply take 30 decimals and all will be well. Besides, 30 is
easier to remember :-).
Now you try to get laid by using this in a bar conversation with
girls. Let me know if it works :-).
cheers,
HJ
--
Hendrik Jan Veenstra
email: mailto:h@...
www: http://www.ision.nl/users/h/index.htmlMessage
Re: [L-OT] Digital signal
2001-11-08 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.