*someone* wrote: > This should go to the OT list, and I promise I won't beat this dying > horse too much longer: :-) So, if it *should* go to the OT list, why in the world don't you at LEAST crosspost it there? I mean, you're not even the first to mention this, but nobody actually ACTED properly. Or is it that all you people need the full attention of 6000+ subscribers? Does that make one feel any better? Btw, I don't mean to insult you personally (that's why I wrote *someone*) but it seems a common behaviour these day to say "I know, this should go to the LUG-OT" - but hell no, better don't even think about DOING what you are saying, that would be taking all those huge OT threads where they belong! I don't have that much time to read emails these days, so I usually leave my OT folder alone until I find some time. But I want to stay on track with this list, so posting threads onto the appropriate lists would be highly welcomed. Not that I have anything against some OT posts, even not on the main LUG, but this list simply is too crowded to keep continuing them. Regards, Sascha
Message
Re: [LUG] Indeed, OT: Herbie Hancock
2001-12-05 by Sascha Franck
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.