> > >> If the record companies cant actually prove ownership of >>the copyrights >> >They don't own copyrights. That's much the point as far as I'm concerned. >If anyone owns copyrights then it's the original author -- who then assigns >it to the publisher. > Don't confuse different copyrights. Not all copyrights are assigned to the publisher. Copyrights in relation to melodies etc are assigned to the publisher. Copyrights related to the master tape/recording are assigned to record companies. >And since the publishing company won't open up its accounts, the authors >don't really have any information. Nasty business. > In every contract I've negotiated so far, I've always included the option to investigate the books of companies, together with an auditing team that I authorize. >>What we really need is for EVERY new artist to refuse to sign away the >>rights to their music. >> >Well ... they have to concede SOME rights otherwise whoever wants to >promote them has no way of being recompensed for their efforts. It's just >what and when and how much. At the moment, it's way too much, way too soon >in the game, and for not enough moolah. > ??? Record companies pay advances that are often way too high!!! The best known case right now is Mariah Carey. So I say it's the other way around: the advances are too high. >There are two sources for it's supposed existence as an ancient Chinese curse. > ROFL... I'm not going into this. Dunno a thing about it. :-)) Cheers, J -- Joeri Vankeirsbilck joeri@... Belway Productions - http://www.belway.com List-admin Logic-users/SoundD*ver-users/Logic-TDM
Message
Re: [L-OT] re: (OT) Bad News in Music INdustry / So the music industry has legit thieves, now?
2002-02-23 by Joeri Vankeirsbilck
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.