Joeri Vankeirsbilck wrote:
>The new automation brings
>Logic a big step closer to Protools, but there's still a way to >go: I
>personally want to see sample accurate waveform zoom in the >arrangment.
>I want to see timestretching of audio in the arrangment the same >way
>Protools does it. Groups have to be added for mixing (Logic >Control has
>a button named "groups", so it looks like that one is on its way) >etc.
This is exactly what we need!! So how about being our "lobbyist" to Emagic? Represent our "special interest" group. I can see it now...You have a political career awaiting you infront of your eyes:-))
--Roger
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [L-OT] Why Logic over digital performer or ProTools?
2002-03-08 by litepipe