The Logic Off Topic list

>
>
>  I am a new Logic user (I recieve my softwar tommorrow) and I 
>have been using Digital Performer for about a year and ProTools 
>for six years.  I bought Logic because I have heard it is a great 
>creative tool.  I had a demo of Platinum and I really liked the 
>sound of the plugins but I couldn't grasp a lot of the concepts of 
>the objects and environment.  
>     Anyway I just wanted some feedback from some more 
>seasoned users of Logic.
>
I can't comment on digital performer: never used it. However, I've used 
Protools and imo Protools and Logic can't be compared.
Protools is still much better for audio editing. Logic is a more 
creative tool for arranging, composing etc. The new automation brings 
Logic a big step closer to Protools, but there's still a way to go: I 
personally want to see sample accurate waveform zoom in the arrangment. 
I want to see timestretching of audio in the arrangment the same way 
Protools does it. Groups have to be added for mixing (Logic Control has 
a button named "groups", so it looks like that one is on its way) etc. 
All in all, both Logic and Protools has its strengths and weaknesses. 
They don't fully replace eachother imo.

Bye,
Joeri

-- 
Joeri Vankeirsbilck
joeri@...

Belway Productions      -     http://www.belway.com
List-admin   Logic-users/SoundD*ver-users/Logic-TDM

Joeri Vankeirsbilck wrote: 
  >The new automation brings 
  >Logic a big step closer to Protools, but there's still a way to >go: I 
  >personally want to see sample accurate waveform zoom in the >arrangment. 
  >I want to see timestretching of audio in the arrangment the same >way 
  >Protools does it. Groups have to be added for mixing (Logic >Control has 
  >a button named "groups", so it looks like that one is on its way) >etc. 
   
    This is exactly what we need!! So how about being our "lobbyist" to Emagic? Represent our "special interest" group. I can see it now...You have a political career awaiting you infront of your eyes:-)) 

    --Roger



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>
>
>   Joeri Vankeirsbilck wrote: 
>  >The new automation brings 
>  >Logic a big step closer to Protools, but there's still a way to >go: I 
>  >personally want to see sample accurate waveform zoom in the >arrangment. 
>  >I want to see timestretching of audio in the arrangment the same >way 
>  >Protools does it. Groups have to be added for mixing (Logic >Control has 
>  >a button named "groups", so it looks like that one is on its way) >etc. 
>   
>    This is exactly what we need!! So how about being our "lobbyist" to Emagic? Represent our "special interest" group.
>
What do you think I'm doing half of the time? :-)))
Of course I'm lobbying for features I want. I'm also lobbying for good 
features that I picked up on the LUG etc.
And I'm not alone.

Cheers,
Joeri

-- 
Joeri Vankeirsbilck
joeri@...

Belway Productions      -     http://www.belway.com
List-admin   Logic-users/SoundD*ver-users/Logic-TDM